Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

GE Vernova's Grid SoftwareGE Vernova's Grid Software
VS
GoogleGoogle
GE Vernova's Grid Software

GE Vernova's Grid Software

58 Charles St, Cambridge, 02141, US

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
781/1000Fair

Grid Software, part of GE Vernova's Electrification Software business, provides utilities with GridOS® orchestration software that accelerates the transformation to a secure, reliable and affordable grid that electrifies the world with sustainable energy. Progressive ut...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:15
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Google

Google

1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, 94043, US

Last Update: 10/07/2026

View Profile
Between 0 and 549
https://goo.gle/3DLEokh
161/1000Critical

A problem isn't truly solved until it's solved for all. Googlers build products that help create opportunities for everyone, whether down the street or across the globe. Bring your insight, imagination and a healthy disregard for the impossible. Bring everything that ma...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:313,465
Subsidiaries:52
12-month incidents
47
Known data breaches
21
Attack type number
5

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
GE Vernova's Grid Software

GE Vernova's Grid Software

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Google

Google

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for GE Vernova's Grid Software in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

Google has 4376.19% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - GE Vernova's Grid Software (X = Date, Y = Severity)

GE Vernova's Grid Software cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Google (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Google cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
GE Vernova's Grid Software

GE Vernova's Grid Software

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Google

Google

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
GOOCOI1783686858
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
THECLOGOOTHE1782224973
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
GOOTIK1781684782

FAQ

Between GE Vernova's Grid Software company and Google company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between GE Vernova's Grid Software company and Google company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between GE Vernova's Grid Software company and Google company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between GE Vernova's Grid Software company and Google company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between GE Vernova's Grid Software company and Google company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between GE Vernova's Grid Software company and Google company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between GE Vernova's Grid Software company and Google company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between GE Vernova's Grid Software company and Google company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between GE Vernova's Grid Software company and Google company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between GE Vernova's Grid Software company and Google company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between GE Vernova's Grid Software company and Google company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between GE Vernova's Grid Software and Google, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between GE Vernova's Grid Software and Google, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - GE Vernova's Grid Software or Google ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - GE Vernova's Grid Software or Google ?
Between GE Vernova's Grid Software and Google, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between GE Vernova's Grid Software and Google, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1