Comparison Overview

GETRAG

VS

Nissan Motor Corporation

GETRAG

Hermann-Hagenmeyer-Straße, Untergruppenbach, undefined, 74199, DE
Last Update: 2025-05-06 (UTC)
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.getrag.com

GETRAG is a worldwide system supplier of transmissions system for passenger cars and light commercial vehicles with around 14,200 employees at 20 sites. Our products range from manual transmissions to dual clutch transmissions through to transmissions for hybrid and electric drives. On January 1st 2016, GETRAG was acquired by Magna International, one of the world’s largest automotive supplier.

NAICS: 3361
NAICS Definition: Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees: 873
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Nissan Motor Corporation

1-1, Takashima 1-chome,, None, Yokohama-shi, Kanagawa, JP, 220-8686
Last Update: 2025-08-20 (UTC)
Between 600 and 649
http://www.nissan-global.com

Nissan Motor Corporation is a global car manufacturer that sells a full line of vehicles under the Nissan and INFINITI brands. Nissan’s global headquarters in Yokohama, Japan, manages operations in four regions: Japan-ASEAN, China, Americas, and AMIEO (Africa, Middle East, India, Europe & Oceania). For more information about our products, services and commitment to sustainable mobility, visit nissan-global.com. You can also follow us on Facebook, Instagram, Twitter and LinkedIn and see all our latest videos on YouTube.

NAICS: 3361
NAICS Definition: Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees: 45,615
Subsidiaries: 7
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
3

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/getrag.jpeg
GETRAG
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nissan-motor-corporation.jpeg
Nissan Motor Corporation
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
GETRAG
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Nissan Motor Corporation
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for GETRAG in 2025.

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Nissan Motor Corporation in 2025.

Incident History — GETRAG (X = Date, Y = Severity)

GETRAG cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Nissan Motor Corporation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Nissan Motor Corporation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/getrag.jpeg
GETRAG
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nissan-motor-corporation.jpeg
Nissan Motor Corporation
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2023
Type:Data Leak
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 11/2023
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2022
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Inadvertent Disclosure
Blog: Blog

FAQ

GETRAG company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Nissan Motor Corporation company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Nissan Motor Corporation company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas GETRAG company has not reported any.

In the current year, Nissan Motor Corporation company and GETRAG company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Nissan Motor Corporation company nor GETRAG company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Nissan Motor Corporation company has disclosed at least one data breach, while GETRAG company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Nissan Motor Corporation company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while GETRAG company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither GETRAG company nor Nissan Motor Corporation company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither GETRAG nor Nissan Motor Corporation holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Nissan Motor Corporation company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to GETRAG company.

Nissan Motor Corporation company employs more people globally than GETRAG company, reflecting its scale as a Motor Vehicle Manufacturing.

Neither GETRAG nor Nissan Motor Corporation holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither GETRAG nor Nissan Motor Corporation holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither GETRAG nor Nissan Motor Corporation holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither GETRAG nor Nissan Motor Corporation holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither GETRAG nor Nissan Motor Corporation holds HIPAA certification.

Neither GETRAG nor Nissan Motor Corporation holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

The Bold Page Builder plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the ‘percentage’ parameter in all versions up to, and including, 5.4.5 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page.

Published
Date
2025-10-23
Updated
Date
2025-10-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

The ComboServlet in Liferay Portal 7.4.0 through 7.4.3.111, and older unsupported versions, and Liferay DXP 2023.Q4.0 through 2023.Q4.2, 2023.Q3.1 through 2023.Q3.5, 7.4 GA through update 92, 7.3 GA through update 35, and older unsupported versions does not limit the number or size of the files it will combine, which allows remote attackers to create very large responses that lead to a denial of service attack via the URL query string.

Published
Date
2025-10-23
Updated
Date
2025-10-23
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

A relative path traversal vulnerability was discovered in Productivity Suite software version 4.4.1.19. The vulnerability allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to interact with the ProductivityService PLC simulator and delete arbitrary directories on the target machine.

Published
Date
2025-10-23
Updated
Date
2025-10-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

A relative path traversal vulnerability was discovered in Productivity Suite software version 4.4.1.19. The vulnerability allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to interact with the ProductivityService PLC simulator and create arbitrary directories on the target machine.

Published
Date
2025-10-23
Updated
Date
2025-10-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

A relative path traversal vulnerability was discovered in Productivity Suite software version 4.4.1.19. The vulnerability allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to interact with the ProductivityService PLC simulator and delete arbitrary files on the target machine.

Published
Date
2025-10-23
Updated
Date
2025-10-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:H
cvss4
Base: 8.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:H/SC:N/SI:L/SA:L/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References