Comparison Overview
Genea

Genea
19100 Von Karman, Suite 550, Irvine, CA, US, 92612
Last Update: 07/10/2026
Genea provides best-in-class innovation to drive the future of property technology. Our cutting-edge security, visitor management, submeter billing, and after-hours HVAC software have helped over 4,500 companies transform and streamline their operations. With the combin...

bigbasket
Fairway Business Park, Embassy Golf Links Road, Challaghatta, Bangalore, 560071, IN
Last Update: 13/09/2026
Starting our journey in 2011, today, bigbasket - a Tata Enterprise is India’s largest online supermarket with over 13 million customers and a presence in 60+ cities & towns. With our presence spanning the entire spectrum of consumer needs, we operate through a range of ...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Genea







bigbasket






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)
Genea has 4.76% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for bigbasket in 2026.
Incident History - Genea (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Genea cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - bigbasket (X = Date, Y = Severity)
bigbasket cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Genea

bigbasket
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.
IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.
IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.