Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Georgia Water Alliance

Georgia Water Alliance Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

gawateralliance.org

The Georgia Water Alliance is a statewide professional association representing Georgia’s private water utilities. We advance advocacy, education, and operational excellence while providing a unified voice on regulatory and legislative issues. Our mission is to strengthen private water systems so they can deliver reliable, sustainable service to the communities they serve.


GWA A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

GWA
Company Information
Website:http://gawateralliance.org
Employees number:1
Number of followers:99
NAICS:22
Industry Type:Utilities
Homepage:gawateralliance.org
GWA Risk Score (AI oriented)
Between 700 and 749
logo
GWAUtilities
Updated:
09/08/2026
733/1000
Moderate
Ba
AaaAaABaaBaBCaaCaC
Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
Insurance prefers TPRM score to calculate premium
GWA Global Score (TPRM)
xxxx
logo
GWAUtilities
•••
Score locked
Instant access to detailed risk factors
Vulnerabilities
Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
Findings

GWA
GWAModerate
Current Score
733Ba (MODERATE)
01000
1 incidents
-19 avg impact
Incident timeline with MITRE ATT&CK tactics, techniques, and mitigations.
AUGUST 2026
752Before Incident
Cyber Attack
07 Aug 2026GWA
Georgia Water Systems: Oregon drinking water system accessed in recent cyber attacks

Cyberattack on Oregon Water District as Part of Nationwide Hacking Campaign

733After Incident
CRITICAL-19
GEO1786271640
Cyberattack Targets Oregon Water District as Nationwide Hacking Campaign Expands Oregon officials confirmed that hackers breached an unspecified water district’s operational technology in July, marking the state’s inclusion in a broader wave of cyberattacks targeting U.S. municipal water systems. The incident, disclosed by Governor Tina Kotek’s office on August 2, remains under investigation, with authorities declining to identify the affected district or confirm potential links to Iranian-backed hackers a connection suggested in a New York Times report published July 30. The Times revealed that at least 100 water systems across seven states, including Minnesota and Georgia, had been compromised in late July. In Minnesota, over 30 systems were hit, with one treatment plant temporarily going offline. Georgia’s attacks caused pressure drops, prompting a brief boil-water advisory. The FBI’s July 30 press release acknowledged that some intrusions "degraded water operations," including disruptions to programmable logic controllers (PLCs) industrial computers that regulate equipment. Hackers accessed these devices via the internet, altering IP addresses and passwords to disable monitoring and control functions. Reported consequences included flooding and pressure loss, which could allow untreated groundwater to contaminate supply lines. Oregon’s Enterprise Information Services confirmed the state’s awareness of the July incident but deferred questions to federal investigators or the affected entity. While the state provides cybersecurity support to local water districts, all systems are independently managed. Responses from major Oregon providers including Portland Water Bureau, Tualatin Valley Water District, Klamath Falls, Corvallis, Redmond, and Bend indicated no confirmed breaches, though some noted an uptick in attempted intrusions. The FBI has urged water operators nationwide to restrict remote access, implement security protocols, and maintain manual backup systems to mitigate risks. The attacks underscore vulnerabilities in critical infrastructure, with the FBI warning that compromised PLCs could lead to operational failures with public health implications. Investigations into the scope and attribution of the campaign remain ongoing.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Cyberattack
MOTIVATION
Disruption of critical infrastructure, potential geopolitical motives
IMPACT
Systems Affected: Programmable logic controllers (PLCs), water treatment and distribution systemsOperational Impact: Flooding, pressure loss, potential contamination of water supply, temporary offline status of treatment plantsBrand Reputation Impact: Potential reputational damage to affected water districts
JULY 2026
752Before Incident
JUNE 2026
752Before Incident
MAY 2026
752Before Incident
APRIL 2026
752Before Incident
MARCH 2026
752Before Incident
FEBRUARY 2026
752Before Incident
JANUARY 2026
752Before Incident
DECEMBER 2025
752Before Incident
NOVEMBER 2025
752Before Incident
OCTOBER 2025
752Before Incident
SEPTEMBER 2025
752Before Incident

Frequently Asked Questions

?
What is the current A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score for GWA ?
?
What was GWA's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in July 2026 ?
?
What was GWA's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in June 2026 ?
?
What was GWA's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in May 2026 ?
?
What was GWA's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in April 2026 ?
?
What was GWA's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in March 2026 ?
?
What was GWA's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in February 2026 ?
?
What was GWA's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in January 2026 ?
?
What was GWA's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in December 2025 ?
?
What was GWA's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in November 2025 ?
?
What was GWA's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in October 2025 ?
?
What was GWA's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in September 2025 ?
?
What is the average per-incident point impact on GWA's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score over the past 12 months ?
?
Where can I access detailed records of all cyber incidents associated with GWA ?
?
Where can I find a summary of the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?
?
Where can I view GWA's profile page on Rankiteo ?
?
How accurate is the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?