Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Georgia State Executive EducationGeorgia State Executive Education
VS
Università degli Studi di PadovaUniversità degli Studi di Padova
Georgia State Executive Education

Georgia State Executive Education

undefined, Atlanta, undefined, undefined, US

Last Update: 19/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://execed.gsu.edu
770/1000Fair

Accelerate your career with one of our executive certificate programs in leadership, innovation or general management. Held at the state-of-the-art Georgia State Buckhead Center.

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:0
Subsidiaries:7
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Università degli Studi di Padova

Università degli Studi di Padova

via 8 Febbraio, 2 Padova, Padova, Padova, IT, 35122

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.unipd.it
798/1000Fair

Established in 1222, the University of Padova is one of Europe’s oldest and most prestigious seats of learning. Here is where Galileo Galilei taught and Elena Lucrezia Cornaro Piscopia became the first woman in the world to receive a university degree. Traditionally a ...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:11,685
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Georgia State Executive Education

Georgia State Executive Education

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Università degli Studi di Padova

Università degli Studi di Padova

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Georgia State Executive Education in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Università degli Studi di Padova in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Georgia State Executive Education (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Georgia State Executive Education cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Università degli Studi di Padova (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Università degli Studi di Padova cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Georgia State Executive Education

Georgia State Executive Education

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Università degli Studi di Padova

Università degli Studi di Padova

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Georgia State Executive Education company and Università degli Studi di Padova company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Georgia State Executive Education company and Università degli Studi di Padova company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Georgia State Executive Education company and Università degli Studi di Padova company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Georgia State Executive Education company and Università degli Studi di Padova company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Georgia State Executive Education company and Università degli Studi di Padova company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Georgia State Executive Education company and Università degli Studi di Padova company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Georgia State Executive Education company and Università degli Studi di Padova company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Georgia State Executive Education company and Università degli Studi di Padova company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Georgia State Executive Education company and Università degli Studi di Padova company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Georgia State Executive Education company and Università degli Studi di Padova company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Georgia State Executive Education company and Università degli Studi di Padova company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Georgia State Executive Education and Università degli Studi di Padova, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Georgia State Executive Education and Università degli Studi di Padova, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Georgia State Executive Education or Università degli Studi di Padova ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Georgia State Executive Education or Università degli Studi di Padova ?
Between Georgia State Executive Education and Università degli Studi di Padova, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Georgia State Executive Education and Università degli Studi di Padova, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1