Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Geomatics Unit - ULiègeGeomatics Unit - ULiège
VS
Aarhus UniversityAarhus University
Geomatics Unit - ULiège

Geomatics Unit - ULiège

Quartier Agora, Liège, Liège, 4020, BE

Last Update: 27/01/2026

View Profile
752/1000Fair

The Geomatics Unit brings together researchers and teachers in the field of geomatics. It is part of the Department of Geography (Faculty of Sciences) at the University of Liege. The Unit enjoys strong international recognition. It also plays an important role with Belg...

NAICS:N/A
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:5
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Aarhus University

Aarhus University

Nordre Ringgade 1 DK- Aarhus, Aarhus, 8000, DK

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.au.dk
781/1000Fair

About Aarhus University Aarhus University is a leading international research university covering all scientific areas with a staff of 11.000 employees and 44.500 students, the majority are post-graduate students enrolled on Master’s and PhD programmes. Aarhus Univer...

NAICS:N/A
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:11,052
Subsidiaries:3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Geomatics Unit - ULiège

Geomatics Unit - ULiège

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Aarhus University

Aarhus University

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Research Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Geomatics Unit - ULiège in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Research Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Aarhus University in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Geomatics Unit - ULiège (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Geomatics Unit - ULiège cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Aarhus University (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Aarhus University cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Geomatics Unit - ULiège

Geomatics Unit - ULiège

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Aarhus University

Aarhus University

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Geomatics Unit - ULiège company and Aarhus University company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Geomatics Unit - ULiège company and Aarhus University company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Geomatics Unit - ULiège company and Aarhus University company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Geomatics Unit - ULiège company and Aarhus University company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Geomatics Unit - ULiège company and Aarhus University company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Geomatics Unit - ULiège company and Aarhus University company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Geomatics Unit - ULiège company and Aarhus University company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Geomatics Unit - ULiège company and Aarhus University company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Geomatics Unit - ULiège company and Aarhus University company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Geomatics Unit - ULiège company and Aarhus University company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Geomatics Unit - ULiège company and Aarhus University company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Geomatics Unit - ULiège and Aarhus University, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Geomatics Unit - ULiège and Aarhus University, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Geomatics Unit - ULiège or Aarhus University ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Geomatics Unit - ULiège or Aarhus University ?
Between Geomatics Unit - ULiège and Aarhus University, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Geomatics Unit - ULiège and Aarhus University, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-63261
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). A low-privileged authenticated user can send a specially crafted request to a Kibana machine learning feature, causing the server to exhaust available memory and become unavailable to all users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63260
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). An authenticated attacker with low-privilege access can trigger a denial of service condition in Kibana by sending a specially crafted, oversized request payload. Processing this user-supplied input requires resource-intensive memory allocation that can exhaust the available heap memory in the Kibana process, causing it to crash and become unavailable to all users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63259
SUMMARY

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key (CWE-639) in Kibana can lead to information disclosure via user-supplied identifiers that reference scheduled query result data from Kibana Spaces the requester is not authorized to access.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63145
SUMMARY

Incorrect Authorization (CWE-863) in Kibana can lead to integrity compromise of Machine Learning audit and notification records via Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs (CAPEC-1). A vulnerability exists in Kibana's Machine Learning functionality where a Machine Learning management endpoint performs an insufficient authorization check. The endpoint validates only a coarse privilege level but does not verify that the requesting user has access to the specific Machine Learning job or notification resources provided in the request. As a result, a low-privileged user with Machine Learning access in any Kibana space can manipulate Machine Learning audit and notification records for arbitrary jobs—including jobs in other spaces or belonging to other users—by leveraging Kibana's internally elevated credentials to write to restricted Machine Learning system indices that the user cannot access directly.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63144
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Recursion (CWE-674) in Elasticsearch can lead to denial of service via a specially crafted search request submitted by a low-privileged authenticated user. A user with read-level index access can submit a request that triggers unbounded recursive processing within the Elasticsearch query evaluation component, causing a fatal error that terminates the affected node. In single-node deployments, this results in complete service outage; in multi-node clusters, it causes repeated node restarts and sustained availability degradation.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8