Geoban-sa vs Marshmclennan - Cyber Risk Comparison & Security Rating

Comparison Overview

Geoban SA

Marsh McLennan

Geoban SA

C/Jacinto Benavente 2C, Las Rozas, 28232, ES

Last Update: 24/12/2025

View Profile

Between 750 and 799

https://www.santanderglobaloperations.com/

755/1000Fair

Inactive profile. For more info go to: https://www.linkedin.com/company/santander-global-operations/ Thanks

NAICS:52

NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance

Employees:207

Subsidiaries:24

12-month incidents

Known data breaches

Attack type number

Marsh McLennan

1166 Avenue of the Americas, New York, NY, US, 10036

Last Update: 11/09/2026

View Profile

Between 800 and 849

http://www.corporate.marsh.com

809/1000Good

Marsh (NYSE: MRSH) is a global leader in risk, strategy and people, advising clients in 130 countries across four businesses: Marsh Risk, Guy Carpenter, Mercer and Oliver Wyman. With annual revenue over $24 billion and more than 90,000 ...

NAICS:52

NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance

Employees:45,730

Subsidiaries:0

12-month incidents

Known data breaches

Attack type number

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category

Geoban SA

ISO 27001Not verified

SOC2 Type 1Not verified

SOC2 Type 2Not verified

GDPRNot verified

PCI DSSNot verified

HIPAANot verified

Marsh McLennan

ISO 27001Not verified

SOC2 Type 1Not verified

SOC2 Type 2Not verified

GDPRNot verified

PCI DSSNot verified

HIPAANot verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Geoban SA in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Marsh McLennan in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Geoban SA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Geoban SA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware

C - Cyber Attack

D - Data Breach

V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Marsh McLennan (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Marsh McLennan cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware

C - Cyber Attack

D - Data Breach

V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...

Geoban SA

Incidents

No explicit notable incidents reported.

Marsh McLennan

Incidents

🔒 Incident : Data Leak

MAR18242223

🔒 Incident : Breach

MAR307072525

FAQ

Between Geoban SA company and Marsh McLennan company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?

Between Geoban SA company and Marsh McLennan company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?

Between Geoban SA company and Marsh McLennan company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?

Between Geoban SA company and Marsh McLennan company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?

Between Geoban SA company and Marsh McLennan company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?

Between Geoban SA company and Marsh McLennan company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?

Between Geoban SA company and Marsh McLennan company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?

Between Geoban SA company and Marsh McLennan company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?

Between Geoban SA company and Marsh McLennan company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?

Between Geoban SA company and Marsh McLennan company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?

Between Geoban SA company and Marsh McLennan company, which one has the largest number of employees ?

Between Geoban SA and Marsh McLennan, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?

Between Geoban SA and Marsh McLennan, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?

Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Geoban SA or Marsh McLennan ?

Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Geoban SA or Marsh McLennan ?

Between Geoban SA and Marsh McLennan, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?

Between Geoban SA and Marsh McLennan, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-96451

SUMMARY

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key vulnerability in Ultimate Member Ultimate Member ultimate-member allows Privilege Escalation.This issue affects Ultimate Member: from n/a through 2.13.1.

PUBLISHED

Date2026-10-03

UPDATED

Date2026-10-03

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)

CVSS3

Base Score: 8.8

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

IMPACT SCORE

5.9

EXPLOITABILITY

2.8

REFERENCES

https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/ultimate-member/vulnerability/wordpress-ultimate-member-plugin-2-13-1-privilege-escalation-vulnerability?_s_id=cve

CVE-2026-103342

SUMMARY

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in Unlimited Elements Unlimited Elements For Elementor (Free Widgets, Addons, Templates) unlimited-elements-for-elementor allows Reflected XSS.This issue affects Unlimited Elements For Elementor (Free Widgets, Addons, Templates): from n/a through 2.0.20.

PUBLISHED

Date2026-10-03

UPDATED

Date2026-10-03

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)

CVSS3

Base Score: 7.1

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L

IMPACT SCORE

3.7

EXPLOITABILITY

2.8

REFERENCES

https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/unlimited-elements-for-elementor/vulnerability/wordpress-unlimited-elements-for-elementor-free-widgets-addons-templates-plugin-2-0-20-cross-site-scripting-xss-vulnerability?_s_id=cve

CVE-2026-103065

SUMMARY

Improper Validation of Specified Quantity in Input vulnerability in Themeum Kirki kirki allows Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs.This issue affects Kirki: from n/a through 6.3.1.

PUBLISHED

Date2026-10-03

UPDATED

Date2026-10-03

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.2)

CVSS3

Base Score: 8.2

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N

IMPACT SCORE

4.2

EXPLOITABILITY

3.9

REFERENCES

https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/kirki/vulnerability/wordpress-kirki-plugin-6-3-1-arbitrary-code-execution-vulnerability?_s_id=cve

CVE-2026-105122

SUMMARY

OpenAM before 16.1.3 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers able to register or modify OAuth 2.0 clients to make OpenAM fetch internal resources via an unvalidated jwks_uri. Attackers can trigger unauthenticated fetches through client-authentication and ID-token validation to probe internal hosts, metadata endpoints or local files, or exhaust request threads for denial of service.

PUBLISHED

Date2026-10-03

UPDATED

Date2026-10-03

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)

CVSS3

Base Score: 5.4

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L

CVSS4

Base Score: 5.3

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

IMPACT SCORE

2.5

EXPLOITABILITY

2.8

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-105121

SUMMARY

OpenAM before 16.1.3 contains an improper authorization vulnerability that allows delegated administrators to destroy sessions outside their realms because realm checks use the requester's realm. Authenticated accounts holding the iplanet-am-session-destroy-sessions attribute can supply a target session identifier or handle to forcibly log out users in any realm.

PUBLISHED

Date2026-10-03

UPDATED

Date2026-10-03

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.9)

CVSS3

Base Score: 4.9

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

CVSS4

Base Score: 6.9

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

IMPACT SCORE

3.6

EXPLOITABILITY

1.2

REFERENCES