Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Genting BerhadGenting Berhad
VS
OdebrechtOdebrecht
Genting Berhad

Genting Berhad

14th Floor, Wisma Genting, Jalan Sultan Ismail, Kuala Lumpur, None, MY, 50250

Last Update: 09/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.genting.com
756/1000Fair

Genting Berhad is principally an investment holding and management company. While the Company was incorporated in 1968 and listed in 1971, the Genting Group was founded in 1965 when its Founder, the late Tan Sri Lim Goh Tong started the journey to realise his vision of ...

NAICS:5239
NAICS Definition:Other Financial Investment Activities
Employees:4,091
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Odebrecht

Odebrecht

Av. Luís Viana, 2841, Salvador, 41730-900, BR

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.novonor.com.br/
783/1000Fair

Founded in 1944, Odebrecht is a Brazilian group with diverse businesses and world-class standards of quality. Its Members, guided by the Group’s own philosophy, the Odebrecht Entrepreneurial Technology (TEO), provide services and manufacture products for clients on fiv...

NAICS:5239
NAICS Definition:Other Financial Investment Activities
Employees:14,112
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Genting Berhad

Genting Berhad

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Odebrecht

Odebrecht

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Investment Management Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Genting Berhad in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Investment Management Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Odebrecht in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Genting Berhad (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Genting Berhad cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Odebrecht (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Odebrecht cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Genting Berhad

Genting Berhad

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Odebrecht

Odebrecht

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Genting Berhad company and Odebrecht company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Genting Berhad company and Odebrecht company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Genting Berhad company and Odebrecht company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Genting Berhad company and Odebrecht company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Genting Berhad company and Odebrecht company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Genting Berhad company and Odebrecht company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Genting Berhad company and Odebrecht company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Genting Berhad company and Odebrecht company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Genting Berhad company and Odebrecht company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Genting Berhad company and Odebrecht company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Genting Berhad company and Odebrecht company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Genting Berhad and Odebrecht, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Genting Berhad and Odebrecht, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Genting Berhad or Odebrecht ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Genting Berhad or Odebrecht ?
Between Genting Berhad and Odebrecht, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Genting Berhad and Odebrecht, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-49416
SUMMARY

The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49414
SUMMARY

The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49417
SUMMARY

Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49413
SUMMARY

The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49412
SUMMARY

The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA