Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Genghis Capital LtdGenghis Capital Ltd
VS
MassMutualMassMutual
Genghis Capital Ltd

Genghis Capital Ltd

Westlands Road, Nairobi, 00100, KE

Last Update: 21/03/2026

View Profile
753/1000Fair

Genghis Capital is an innovative and customer focused Investment Bank licensed by the Capital Markets Authority (CMA). It started off as a stockbrokerage firm in 2008. A Participant of the Nairobi Securities Exchange (NSE), the firm has grown tremendously and has expand...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:64
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
MassMutual

MassMutual

1295 State Street, Springfield, Massachusetts, US, 01111

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 600 and 649
https://www.MassMutual.com
615/1000Poor

Living mutual has always been at the core of our human existence, and it's the principle that's guided us since our founding in 1851. It's not a concept we invented, but one we champion for the simple reason that people take it for granted today. While the world would ...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:12,485
Subsidiaries:61
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
10
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Genghis Capital Ltd

Genghis Capital Ltd

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
MassMutual

MassMutual

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Genghis Capital Ltd in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MassMutual in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Genghis Capital Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Genghis Capital Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - MassMutual (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MassMutual cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Genghis Capital Ltd

Genghis Capital Ltd

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
MassMutual

MassMutual

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
MAS1026070925
🔒 Incident : Breach
MAS654072525
🔒 Incident : Breach
MAS701072625

FAQ

Between Genghis Capital Ltd company and MassMutual company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Genghis Capital Ltd company and MassMutual company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Genghis Capital Ltd company and MassMutual company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Genghis Capital Ltd company and MassMutual company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Genghis Capital Ltd company and MassMutual company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Genghis Capital Ltd company and MassMutual company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Genghis Capital Ltd company and MassMutual company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Genghis Capital Ltd company and MassMutual company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Genghis Capital Ltd company and MassMutual company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Genghis Capital Ltd company and MassMutual company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Genghis Capital Ltd company and MassMutual company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Genghis Capital Ltd and MassMutual, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Genghis Capital Ltd and MassMutual, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Genghis Capital Ltd or MassMutual ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Genghis Capital Ltd or MassMutual ?
Between Genghis Capital Ltd and MassMutual, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Genghis Capital Ltd and MassMutual, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2