Comparison Overview
Generali Concierge Services

Generali Concierge Services
11, Avenue François Mitterrand, St.-Denis, 93210, FR
Last Update: 20/02/2026
Generali Concierge Services a été créée en 2016, filiale à 100% d'Europ Assistance, entreprise du groupe Generali. Elle est la nouvelle référence de conciergerie personnalisée : parce que chacun de nos clients est unique, nous développons une offre et un programme sur-m...

Australia Post
111 Bourke St, Melbourne, 3000, AU
Last Update: 14/09/2026
Connecting businesses with consumers is the heart of commercial prosperity and the cornerstone of Australia Post's commitment to Australian businesses. As connectivity transforms our lives, Australia Post is evolving to meet the future needs of businesses by providing t...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Generali Concierge Services







Australia Post






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Consumer Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Generali Concierge Services in 2026.
Incidents vs Consumer Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Australia Post in 2026.
Incident History - Generali Concierge Services (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Generali Concierge Services cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Australia Post (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Australia Post cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Generali Concierge Services

Australia Post
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Requesting a user or organization profile page (`GET /{username}`) with an `Accept: application/rss+xml` or `Accept: application/atom+xml` header returned the owner's activity feed without the visibility check that the profile page and the `.rss` and `.atom` routes apply. Anonymous users, restricted users and non-members could confirm the existence of limited or private users and private organizations and read their profile details and public activity, also when `[other] ENABLE_FEED` was disabled. Activity in private repositories was not included.
The Gitea API endpoint for creating push mirrors (`POST /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/push_mirrors`) checked only whether mirroring was enabled and not the `[mirror] DISABLE_NEW_PUSH` setting that the web interface enforces. A repository administrator could therefore create new push mirrors on instances where the site administrator had disabled them. A push mirror pushes all refs of the repository to a remote chosen by the caller, on each commit or on a schedule.
The Gitea API endpoint `GET /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/media/{filepath}` wrote files of up to 1 KiB that are stored directly in Git, not in LFS, to the response without the content type and disposition headers Gitea uses for user content. An HTML file committed to a repository was therefore rendered by the browser on the Gitea origin. A user who can push to a repository could run JavaScript in the session of a victim who opens the media URL and act with the victim's permissions.
With `[repository] FORCE_PRIVATE = true`, Gitea creates new repositories as private, but the post-receive hook still applied the `repo.private=false` push option to an empty repository created by push. Any user who can create repositories could make their new repository public in violation of the instance policy. The default configuration is not affected.
The Gitea push mirror API checked whether the repository owner, instead of the requesting user, may use local file system paths. On instances with `[security] IMPORT_LOCAL_PATHS = true`, a repository administrator who is not allowed to import local paths could add a push mirror to a local path on the server when the repository owner has that permission. Gitea then pushed the repository's refs into an existing Git repository at that path with the permissions of the Gitea process.