Comparison Overview
General Pharmaceutical Council (GPhC)

General Pharmaceutical Council (GPhC)
25 Canada Square, Canary Wharf, London, GB, E14 5LQ
Last Update: 25/01/2026
The General Pharmaceutical Council (GPhC) is the independent regulator for pharmacists, pharmacy technicians and pharmacy premises in Great Britain. We work to assure and improve standards of care for people using pharmacy services. What we do Our role is to protect ...

TÜV SÜD
Westendstr. 199, Munich, Germany, DE, 80686
Last Update: 01/04/2026
TÜV SÜD is the trusted partner of choice for safety, security and sustainability solutions. Our community of experts is passionate about technology and united by the belief that technology should better people’s lives. We work alongside our customers to anticipate and...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

General Pharmaceutical Council (GPhC)







TÜV SÜD






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Public Safety Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for General Pharmaceutical Council (GPhC) in 2026.
Incidents vs Public Safety Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for TÜV SÜD in 2026.
Incident History - General Pharmaceutical Council (GPhC) (X = Date, Y = Severity)
General Pharmaceutical Council (GPhC) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - TÜV SÜD (X = Date, Y = Severity)
TÜV SÜD cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

General Pharmaceutical Council (GPhC)

TÜV SÜD
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
HTTP/2 servers could end up crashing due to inadvertently modifying its HPACK encoder concurrently. This happens because the server modifies the HPACK encoder from two goroutines without synchronization: one uses the encoder to encode a HEADERS frame as part of a response sent to a client and the other modifies the encoder's table size when handling a SETTINGS frame containing SETTINGS_HEADER_TABLE_SIZE that a client sends. A malicious client can repeatedly send a request while changing the header table size to crash the server.
Multiple ECH outer extension references are not permitted under RFC 9849; previously, a client could send a well-crafted packet that could trigger memory exhaustion in the server process by specifying multiple references. We now reject these as malformed and curb the memory amplification vector as a result.
A trusted template author may have previously written a valid template wherein the use of the 'yield' keyword would not be correctly escaped. We now ensure that valid keyword uses are escaped and non-keyword uses are not escaped.
Improper certificate validation in Microsoft Partner Center allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.
Authorization bypass through user-controlled key in Microsoft Bookings allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.