Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

General Pharmaceutical Council (GPhC)General Pharmaceutical Council (GPhC)
VS
TÜV SÜDTÜV SÜD
General Pharmaceutical Council (GPhC)

General Pharmaceutical Council (GPhC)

25 Canada Square, Canary Wharf, London, GB, E14 5LQ

Last Update: 25/01/2026

View Profile
766/1000Fair

The General Pharmaceutical Council (GPhC) is the independent regulator for pharmacists, pharmacy technicians and pharmacy premises in Great Britain. We work to assure and improve standards of care for people using pharmacy services. What we do Our role is to protect ...

NAICS:92219
NAICS Definition:Other Justice, Public Order, and Safety Activities
Employees:854
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
TÜV SÜD

TÜV SÜD

Westendstr. 199, Munich, Germany, DE, 80686

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.tuvsud.com
796/1000Fair

TÜV SÜD is the trusted partner of choice for safety, security and sustainability solutions. Our community of experts is passionate about technology and united by the belief that technology should better people’s lives. We work alongside our customers to anticipate and...

NAICS:92219
NAICS Definition:Other Justice, Public Order, and Safety Activities
Employees:17,734
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
General Pharmaceutical Council (GPhC)

General Pharmaceutical Council (GPhC)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
TÜV SÜD

TÜV SÜD

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Safety Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for General Pharmaceutical Council (GPhC) in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Public Safety Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for TÜV SÜD in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - General Pharmaceutical Council (GPhC) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

General Pharmaceutical Council (GPhC) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - TÜV SÜD (X = Date, Y = Severity)

TÜV SÜD cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
General Pharmaceutical Council (GPhC)

General Pharmaceutical Council (GPhC)

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
TÜV SÜD

TÜV SÜD

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between General Pharmaceutical Council (GPhC) company and TÜV SÜD company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between General Pharmaceutical Council (GPhC) company and TÜV SÜD company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between General Pharmaceutical Council (GPhC) company and TÜV SÜD company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between General Pharmaceutical Council (GPhC) company and TÜV SÜD company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between General Pharmaceutical Council (GPhC) company and TÜV SÜD company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between General Pharmaceutical Council (GPhC) company and TÜV SÜD company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between General Pharmaceutical Council (GPhC) company and TÜV SÜD company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between General Pharmaceutical Council (GPhC) company and TÜV SÜD company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between General Pharmaceutical Council (GPhC) company and TÜV SÜD company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between General Pharmaceutical Council (GPhC) company and TÜV SÜD company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between General Pharmaceutical Council (GPhC) company and TÜV SÜD company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between General Pharmaceutical Council (GPhC) and TÜV SÜD, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between General Pharmaceutical Council (GPhC) and TÜV SÜD, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - General Pharmaceutical Council (GPhC) or TÜV SÜD ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - General Pharmaceutical Council (GPhC) or TÜV SÜD ?
Between General Pharmaceutical Council (GPhC) and TÜV SÜD, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between General Pharmaceutical Council (GPhC) and TÜV SÜD, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97032
SUMMARY

HTTP/2 servers could end up crashing due to inadvertently modifying its HPACK encoder concurrently. This happens because the server modifies the HPACK encoder from two goroutines without synchronization: one uses the encoder to encode a HEADERS frame as part of a response sent to a client and the other modifies the encoder's table size when handling a SETTINGS frame containing SETTINGS_HEADER_TABLE_SIZE that a client sends. A malicious client can repeatedly send a request while changing the header table size to crash the server.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97031
SUMMARY

Multiple ECH outer extension references are not permitted under RFC 9849; previously, a client could send a well-crafted packet that could trigger memory exhaustion in the server process by specifying multiple references. We now reject these as malformed and curb the memory amplification vector as a result.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97030
SUMMARY

A trusted template author may have previously written a valid template wherein the use of the 'yield' keyword would not be correctly escaped. We now ensure that valid keyword uses are escaped and non-keyword uses are not escaped.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96207
SUMMARY

Improper certificate validation in Microsoft Partner Center allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-94510
SUMMARY

Authorization bypass through user-controlled key in Microsoft Bookings allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:H/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
5.3
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9