Comparison Overview
Gedik Holding

Gedik Holding
Seyhli, Pendik, 34906, TR
Last Update: 13/12/2025
Gedik Holding’in temeli 1963 yılında kaynak sarf malzemesi üreticisi olarak kurulan Gedik Kaynak ile atılmıştır. Gedik Kaynak ticari hayatını yıllar içinde başarıyla devam ettirmiş ve sektöründe lider konuma gelmiştir. Gedik Holding daha sonra faaliyet alanları arasına ...

CNH
N/A
Last Update: 01/04/2026
CNH ( NYSE: CNH ) is a world-class equipment, technology and services company. The Company operates commercially through its brand portfolio which includes Case IH, New Holland Agriculture, New Holland Construction, and CASE Construction Equipment. CNH has over 35,000...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Gedik Holding







CNH






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Gedik Holding in 2026.
Incidents vs Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for CNH in 2026.
Incident History - Gedik Holding (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Gedik Holding cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - CNH (X = Date, Y = Severity)
CNH cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Gedik Holding

CNH
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Netskope was notified about a potential gap in Netskope Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) running on Windows systems. Successful exploitation of the gap could potentially allow a privileged user to send a crafted message to the EPDLP process port to trigger an integer overflow, leading to memory corruption. Successful exploitation would require the EPDLP module to be enabled in the client configuration, and that Memory Integrity is disabled. A successful exploit could potentially result in a denial-of-service, arbitrary code execution, or privilege escalation on the local machine.
Netskope was notified of an out-of-bounds heap read affecting the Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) service of the Netskope Client. A local standard user could potentially send a specially crafted message that is not properly validated with a bounds check, likely crashing the kernel driver handler. Successful exploitation could potentially crash the EPDLP service, temporarily interrupting DLP enforcement. A successful exploit could potentially also reveal per-boot memory layout information to unauthorized users.
IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 is vulnerable to a denial of service where a specific functionality on a Db2 server can be disabled by a privileged user under certain conditions.
IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an attacker with the ability to control or impersonate a DRDA server endpoint to execute arbitrary commands on Db2 clients due to a stack-based buffer overflow that improperly copies user-controlled data into a fixed-size stack buffer without bounds checking.
IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an authenticated user to send a specially crafted request to write arbitrary files on the system.