Comparison Overview

GEA Group

VS

Metso

GEA Group

Ulmenstraße 99, Düsseldorf, North Rhine-Westphalia, DE, 40476
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

GEA is one of the largest technology suppliers for food processing and a wide range of other industries. The global group specializes in machinery, plants, as well as process technology and components. GEA provides resource-efficient solutions for sophisticated production processes in diverse end-user markets and offers a comprehensive service portfolio.

NAICS: 3332
NAICS Definition: Industrial Machinery Manufacturing
Employees: 12,794
Subsidiaries: 12
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Metso

Rauhalanpuisto 9, Espoo, 02230, FI
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

Metso is a frontrunner in sustainable technologies, end-to-end solutions and services for the aggregates, minerals processing and metals refining industries globally. By improving our customers’ energy and water efficiency, increasing their productivity, and reducing environmental risks with our product and process expertise, we are the partner for positive change. Metso is committed to limiting global warming to 1.5°C with Science Based Targets.

NAICS: 3332
NAICS Definition: Industrial Machinery Manufacturing
Employees: 20,150
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/geagroup.jpeg
GEA Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/metsoofficial.jpeg
Metso
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
GEA Group
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Metso
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Industrial Machinery Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for GEA Group in 2025.

Incidents vs Industrial Machinery Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Metso in 2025.

Incident History — GEA Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

GEA Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Metso (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Metso cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/geagroup.jpeg
GEA Group
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/metsoofficial.jpeg
Metso
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Metso company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to GEA Group company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Metso company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to GEA Group company.

In the current year, Metso company and GEA Group company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Metso company nor GEA Group company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Metso company nor GEA Group company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Metso company nor GEA Group company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither GEA Group company nor Metso company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither GEA Group nor Metso holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

GEA Group company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Metso company.

Metso company employs more people globally than GEA Group company, reflecting its scale as a Industrial Machinery Manufacturing.

Neither GEA Group nor Metso holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither GEA Group nor Metso holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither GEA Group nor Metso holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither GEA Group nor Metso holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither GEA Group nor Metso holds HIPAA certification.

Neither GEA Group nor Metso holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N