Comparison Overview
GEA Food Processing and Packaging

GEA Food Processing and Packaging
Peter-Müller-Str. 12, Dusseldorf, DE
Last Update: 28/12/2025
With a strong global footprint, decades of experience, and a dedicated team of experts, GEA Food Processing & Packaging partners with the global food industry to deliver cutting-edge solutions. We help you optimize operations, improve efficiencies, and adapt to changing...

Lactalis Group
10-20 Rue Adolphe Beck, LAVAL cedex 9, 53089, FR
Last Update: 28/03/2026
From family-owned company to dairy industry’s global leader Created in 1933 by André Besnier in Laval, Lactalis Group is a family-owned company settled in rural areas, which became dairy industry’s global leader and a major player of employment. True to its first trad...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

GEA Food Processing and Packaging







Lactalis Group






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Food and Beverage Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for GEA Food Processing and Packaging in 2026.
Incidents vs Food and Beverage Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Lactalis Group in 2026.
Incident History - GEA Food Processing and Packaging (X = Date, Y = Severity)
GEA Food Processing and Packaging cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Lactalis Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Lactalis Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

GEA Food Processing and Packaging

Lactalis Group
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
In OpenStack Ironic before 38.0.1, the autodetect deploy interface may fail to run cleaning immediately after enrollment with, or changing to, the autodetect deploy interface.
A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. A user with FEATURE_BUILD_SUPPORT enabled and repository write access can exploit a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability within the build API. This allows the user to provide a malicious URL, causing the Quay builder to make requests to internal network addresses. Such an action could lead to the disclosure of sensitive internal information.
A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's exported logs feature. An unauthenticated attacker with a valid file ID could download exported action logs without proper authorization. While file IDs are complex, they can be intercepted from plaintext email or webhook callbacks. This vulnerability leads to information disclosure, potentially exposing sensitive data such as usernames, email addresses, IP addresses, and action-specific metadata.
A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's Stripe billing webhook handler. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to forge billing events by sending crafted JSON requests to the `/webhooks/stripe` endpoint without validating the Stripe-Signature header. Successful exploitation can lead to the unauthorized resetting of a namespace's build quota to its maximum and trigger unsolicited billing emails to namespace administrators.
A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. When the SECURITY_SCANNER_V4_PSK (pre-shared key) is not set, a remote unauthenticated attacker can send POST requests to the security scanner notification endpoint. This allows the attacker to flood the notification queue and inject path traversal characters into Clair API URL paths. The primary consequence is worker resource exhaustion and blind path manipulation on the configured Clair host, potentially leading to a denial of service.