Comparison Overview
GEA Food Processing and Packaging

GEA Food Processing and Packaging
Peter-Müller-Str. 12, Dusseldorf, DE
Last Update: 28/12/2025
With a strong global footprint, decades of experience, and a dedicated team of experts, GEA Food Processing & Packaging partners with the global food industry to deliver cutting-edge solutions. We help you optimize operations, improve efficiencies, and adapt to changing...

JBS
Avenida Marginal Direita do Tietê, 500, São Paulo, 05118-100, BR
Last Update: 07/10/2026
Na JBS, a gente alimenta um futuro melhor. Tudo começou com uma pequena porta de um açougue, há mais de 70 anos. E, daquela porta, surgiram muitas outras. Foi acreditando em coisas simples, em fazer sempre melhor, contando com o trabalho de muita gente e abrindo portas...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

GEA Food Processing and Packaging







JBS






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Food and Beverage Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for GEA Food Processing and Packaging in 2026.
Incidents vs Food and Beverage Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for JBS in 2026.
Incident History - GEA Food Processing and Packaging (X = Date, Y = Severity)
GEA Food Processing and Packaging cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - JBS (X = Date, Y = Severity)
JBS cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

GEA Food Processing and Packaging

JBS
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
HTTP/2 servers could end up crashing due to inadvertently modifying its HPACK encoder concurrently. This happens because the server modifies the HPACK encoder from two goroutines without synchronization: one uses the encoder to encode a HEADERS frame as part of a response sent to a client and the other modifies the encoder's table size when handling a SETTINGS frame containing SETTINGS_HEADER_TABLE_SIZE that a client sends. A malicious client can repeatedly send a request while changing the header table size to crash the server.
Multiple ECH outer extension references are not permitted under RFC 9849; previously, a client could send a well-crafted packet that could trigger memory exhaustion in the server process by specifying multiple references. We now reject these as malformed and curb the memory amplification vector as a result.
A trusted template author may have previously written a valid template wherein the use of the 'yield' keyword would not be correctly escaped. We now ensure that valid keyword uses are escaped and non-keyword uses are not escaped.
Improper certificate validation in Microsoft Partner Center allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.
Authorization bypass through user-controlled key in Microsoft Bookings allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.