Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

GEGE
VS
WärtsiläWärtsilä
GE

GE

41 Farnsworth St, Boston, 02210, US

Last Update: 16/08/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.ge.com
830/1000Good

A new era is here, and we want you to be a part of it. We will now be sharing our content on our respective GE Aerospace and GE Vernova pages. Be sure to follow each to keep up with the future of aviation and energy.

NAICS:3332
NAICS Definition:Industrial Machinery Manufacturing
Employees:95,062
Subsidiaries:21
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Wärtsilä

Wärtsilä

Hiililaiturinkuja 2, Helsinki, 00180, FI

Last Update: 23/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.wartsila.com
787/1000Fair

We are a global leader in innovative technologies and services shaping the decarbonisation of marine and energy. With approximately 6.9 billion euros in sales and 18,000 employees across 78 countries, the Wärtsilä strategy focuses on helping customers to continuously im...

NAICS:3332
NAICS Definition:Industrial Machinery Manufacturing
Employees:16,349
Subsidiaries:4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
GE

GE

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Wärtsilä

Wärtsilä

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Industrial Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for GE in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Industrial Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Wärtsilä in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - GE (X = Date, Y = Severity)

GE cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Wärtsilä (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Wärtsilä cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
GE

GE

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Wärtsilä

Wärtsilä

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between GE company and Wärtsilä company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between GE company and Wärtsilä company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between GE company and Wärtsilä company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between GE company and Wärtsilä company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between GE company and Wärtsilä company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between GE company and Wärtsilä company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between GE company and Wärtsilä company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between GE company and Wärtsilä company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between GE company and Wärtsilä company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between GE company and Wärtsilä company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between GE company and Wärtsilä company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between GE and Wärtsilä, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between GE and Wärtsilä, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - GE or Wärtsilä ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - GE or Wärtsilä ?
Between GE and Wärtsilä, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between GE and Wärtsilä, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-113705
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was determined in a2aproject a2a-rs up to 0.4.3. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file a2a-server/src/error.rs. Executing a manipulation can lead to information exposure through error message. The attack can be executed remotely. This patch is called 713b943af94ab2d521d483b841618b97a2e78a4d. A patch should be applied to remediate this issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-20
UPDATED
Date2026-10-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 5.0
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-9825
SUMMARY

IBM Cyber Fraud 1.0.0 through 1.0.2 has a missing secure attribute allowing sensitive cookies to be transmitted over unencrypted connections, potentially enabling an attacker to intercept session data through network-based attacks.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-20
UPDATED
Date2026-10-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-94402
SUMMARY

IBM Carbon Charts 0.4.0 through 1.27.19 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. The MeterChart component's Title.truncateTitle() function re-inserts a substring of user-supplied label text into the DOM via an unsanitized innerHTML write when the title exceeds the available container width. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary JavaScript in the victim's browser session.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-20
UPDATED
Date2026-10-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-93888
SUMMARY

IBM Sterling Connect Direct for Unix 6.4.0.0 through 6.4.0.6 and 6.3.0.0 through 6.3.0.7 apnotify utility is vulnerable to a code injection due to insufficient validation of user input.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-20
UPDATED
Date2026-10-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-93744
SUMMARY

IBM i 7.3, 7.4, 7.5, and 7.6 could allow an unathenticated remote attacker to bypass security restrictions due to improper access control. By sending a specially crafted HTTP request to any URL within the Navigator application prior to authentication, a bad actor could exploit this vulnerability to alter server-side session security state.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-20
UPDATED
Date2026-10-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9