Comparison Overview
GE Aerospace Research
GE Aerospace Research
1 Research Circle, Niskayuna, 12309, US
Last Update: 26/02/2026
For more than 130 years, GE has invented the future of industry. From Thomas Edison’s first incandescent light bulb to today’s internet-connected jet engines, GE’s home-grown technologies spur world-changing transformations. Fundamental to GE’s DNA is the ardent desire ...
Lufthansa Group
Airportring, Frankfurt, 60546, DE
Last Update: 12/09/2026
The Lufthansa Group is an aviation company with operations worldwide. It plays a leading role in its European home market. With 109,509 employees, the Lufthansa Group generated revenue of EUR 32.770m in the financial year 2022. The Passenger Airlines segment includes, ...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
GE Aerospace Research
Lufthansa Group
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for GE Aerospace Research in 2026.
Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Lufthansa Group in 2026.
Incident History - GE Aerospace Research (X = Date, Y = Severity)
GE Aerospace Research cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Lufthansa Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Lufthansa Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
GE Aerospace Research
Lufthansa Group
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.
IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.
IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.