Comparison Overview
General Dynamics Mission Systems
General Dynamics Mission Systems
15036 Conference Center Dr, Chantilly, 20151, US
Last Update: 27/05/2026
At General Dynamics Mission Systems, a business unit of General Dynamics, we develop mission critical C4ISR solutions across the land, sea, air, space and cyber domains, but that doesn’t tell our whole story. When downed pilots are isolated in enemy territory, our equi...
BAE Systems
BAE Systems, London, SW1Y 5AD, GB
Last Update: 23/09/2026
At BAE Systems, we help our customers to stay a step ahead when protecting people and national security, critical infrastructure and vital information. We provide some of the world’s most advanced, technology-led defence, aerospace and security solutions and employ a sk...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
General Dynamics Mission Systems
BAE Systems
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Defense and Space Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for General Dynamics Mission Systems in 2026.
Incidents vs Defense and Space Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for BAE Systems in 2026.
Incident History - General Dynamics Mission Systems (X = Date, Y = Severity)
General Dynamics Mission Systems cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - BAE Systems (X = Date, Y = Severity)
BAE Systems cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
General Dynamics Mission Systems
BAE Systems
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.
IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.
IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.