Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

GCLO Global Employment InitiativeGCLO Global Employment Initiative
VS
Ministère de l'Éducation nationaleMinistère de l'Éducation nationale
GCLO Global Employment Initiative

GCLO Global Employment Initiative

N/A

Last Update: 06/12/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.state.gov/gclo
756/1000Fair

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:1
Subsidiaries:68
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Ministère de l'Éducation nationale

Ministère de l'Éducation nationale

110 rue de Grenelle, Paris, FR, 75007

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
810/1000Good

Page officielle du ministère de l'Éducation nationale. Retrouvez toute l'information sur www.education.gouv.fr, twitter.com/education_gouv, facebook.com/education.gouv et dans nos lettres d'informations (bulletin hebdo et lettre education.gouv.fr). --------------------...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:129,399
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
GCLO Global Employment Initiative

GCLO Global Employment Initiative

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Ministère de l'Éducation nationale

Ministère de l'Éducation nationale

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for GCLO Global Employment Initiative in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ministère de l'Éducation nationale in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - GCLO Global Employment Initiative (X = Date, Y = Severity)

GCLO Global Employment Initiative cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Ministère de l'Éducation nationale (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ministère de l'Éducation nationale cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
GCLO Global Employment Initiative

GCLO Global Employment Initiative

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Ministère de l'Éducation nationale

Ministère de l'Éducation nationale

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between GCLO Global Employment Initiative company and Ministère de l'Éducation nationale company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between GCLO Global Employment Initiative company and Ministère de l'Éducation nationale company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between GCLO Global Employment Initiative company and Ministère de l'Éducation nationale company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between GCLO Global Employment Initiative company and Ministère de l'Éducation nationale company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between GCLO Global Employment Initiative company and Ministère de l'Éducation nationale company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between GCLO Global Employment Initiative company and Ministère de l'Éducation nationale company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between GCLO Global Employment Initiative company and Ministère de l'Éducation nationale company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between GCLO Global Employment Initiative company and Ministère de l'Éducation nationale company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between GCLO Global Employment Initiative company and Ministère de l'Éducation nationale company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between GCLO Global Employment Initiative company and Ministère de l'Éducation nationale company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between GCLO Global Employment Initiative company and Ministère de l'Éducation nationale company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between GCLO Global Employment Initiative and Ministère de l'Éducation nationale, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between GCLO Global Employment Initiative and Ministère de l'Éducation nationale, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - GCLO Global Employment Initiative or Ministère de l'Éducation nationale ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - GCLO Global Employment Initiative or Ministère de l'Éducation nationale ?
Between GCLO Global Employment Initiative and Ministère de l'Éducation nationale, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between GCLO Global Employment Initiative and Ministère de l'Éducation nationale, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1