Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Gazprom NeftGazprom Neft
VS
repsolrepsol
Gazprom Neft

Gazprom Neft

ул. Почтамтская, д. 3-5,, Санкт-Петербург, 190000,, RU

Last Update: 21/03/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.gazprom-neft.com
831/1000Good

Gazprom Neft is a technological leader in Russia’s oil and gas market. We produce high-quality fuels, lubricants and bitumens for business and retail customers, refuel aircraft, and are developing our filling-stations network. New technologies mean we are constantly imp...

NAICS:211
NAICS Definition:Oil and Gas Extraction
Employees:5,905
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
repsol

repsol

Méndez Álvaro, 44, Madrid, Madrid, ES, 28045

Last Update: 14/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.repsol.com
797/1000Fair

What do you do with the energy that drives you every day? We strive to turn it into something useful for you—your decisions and your next steps. We are a company that explores multi-energy solutions through innovation, technology, and the curiosity of our team. With ove...

NAICS:211
NAICS Definition:Oil and Gas Extraction
Employees:25,536
Subsidiaries:3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Gazprom Neft

Gazprom Neft

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
repsol

repsol

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Gazprom Neft in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for repsol in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Gazprom Neft (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Gazprom Neft cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - repsol (X = Date, Y = Severity)

repsol cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Gazprom Neft

Gazprom Neft

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
repsol

repsol

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Gazprom Neft company and repsol company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Gazprom Neft company and repsol company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Gazprom Neft company and repsol company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Gazprom Neft company and repsol company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Gazprom Neft company and repsol company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Gazprom Neft company and repsol company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Gazprom Neft company and repsol company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Gazprom Neft company and repsol company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Gazprom Neft company and repsol company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Gazprom Neft company and repsol company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Gazprom Neft company and repsol company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Gazprom Neft and repsol, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Gazprom Neft and repsol, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Gazprom Neft or repsol ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Gazprom Neft or repsol ?
Between Gazprom Neft and repsol, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Gazprom Neft and repsol, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97032
SUMMARY

HTTP/2 servers could end up crashing due to inadvertently modifying its HPACK encoder concurrently. This happens because the server modifies the HPACK encoder from two goroutines without synchronization: one uses the encoder to encode a HEADERS frame as part of a response sent to a client and the other modifies the encoder's table size when handling a SETTINGS frame containing SETTINGS_HEADER_TABLE_SIZE that a client sends. A malicious client can repeatedly send a request while changing the header table size to crash the server.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97031
SUMMARY

Multiple ECH outer extension references are not permitted under RFC 9849; previously, a client could send a well-crafted packet that could trigger memory exhaustion in the server process by specifying multiple references. We now reject these as malformed and curb the memory amplification vector as a result.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97030
SUMMARY

A trusted template author may have previously written a valid template wherein the use of the 'yield' keyword would not be correctly escaped. We now ensure that valid keyword uses are escaped and non-keyword uses are not escaped.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96207
SUMMARY

Improper certificate validation in Microsoft Partner Center allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-94510
SUMMARY

Authorization bypass through user-controlled key in Microsoft Bookings allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:H/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
5.3
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9