Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Gatwick Ground Services (GGS)Gatwick Ground Services (GGS)
VS
SafranSafran
Gatwick Ground Services (GGS)

Gatwick Ground Services (GGS)

N/A

Last Update: 29/11/2025

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://TBC
748/1000Moderate

Gatwick Ground Services is a wholly-owned subsidiary of British Airways providing a full range of ground handling services at LGW and LCY.

NAICS:336
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:226
Subsidiaries:6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Safran

Safran

2, Boulevard du général Martial Valin, Paris, 75015, FR

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.safran-group.com/
813/1000Good

Safran is an international high-technology group, operating in the aviation (propulsion, equipment and interiors), defense and space markets. Its core purpose is to contribute to a safer, more sustainable world, where air transport is more environmentally friendly, comf...

NAICS:3364
NAICS Definition:Aerospace Product and Parts Manufacturing
Employees:73,347
Subsidiaries:7
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Gatwick Ground Services (GGS)

Gatwick Ground Services (GGS)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Safran

Safran

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Aviation and Aerospace Component Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Gatwick Ground Services (GGS) in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Aviation and Aerospace Component Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Safran in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Gatwick Ground Services (GGS) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Gatwick Ground Services (GGS) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Safran (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Safran cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Gatwick Ground Services (GGS)

Gatwick Ground Services (GGS)

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Safran

Safran

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Data Leak
SAF04481023

FAQ

Between Gatwick Ground Services (GGS) company and Safran company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Gatwick Ground Services (GGS) company and Safran company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Gatwick Ground Services (GGS) company and Safran company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Gatwick Ground Services (GGS) company and Safran company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Gatwick Ground Services (GGS) company and Safran company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Gatwick Ground Services (GGS) company and Safran company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Gatwick Ground Services (GGS) company and Safran company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Gatwick Ground Services (GGS) company and Safran company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Gatwick Ground Services (GGS) company and Safran company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Gatwick Ground Services (GGS) company and Safran company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Gatwick Ground Services (GGS) company and Safran company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Gatwick Ground Services (GGS) and Safran, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Gatwick Ground Services (GGS) and Safran, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Gatwick Ground Services (GGS) or Safran ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Gatwick Ground Services (GGS) or Safran ?
Between Gatwick Ground Services (GGS) and Safran, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Gatwick Ground Services (GGS) and Safran, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2