Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Gateley VindenGateley Vinden
VS
ALEC HoldingsALEC Holdings
Gateley Vinden

Gateley Vinden

98 King Street, Manchester, M2 4WU, GB

Last Update: 02/01/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.gateleyvinden.com
750/1000Fair

Gateley Vinden is a multi-disciplinary quantity surveying consultancy. Our aim is to provide effective solutions to a wide range of construction related problems and to offer a broad spectrum of construction services under one roof. Gateley Vinden is ‘regulated by t...

NAICS:23
NAICS Definition:Construction
Employees:43
Subsidiaries:8
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
ALEC Holdings

ALEC Holdings

Marina Walk, 3601 - Marina Plaza, Dubai Marina, Dubai, U.A.E., Dubai, Dubai, AE, PO Box 27639

Last Update: 09/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.alec.ae
788/1000Fair

ALEC Holdings, part of the Investment Corporate of Dubai (ICD), is a leading construction and related businesses group operating in the UAE and KSA. The company builds and provides construction solutions that set industry benchmarks for quality, safety, functionality, a...

NAICS:23
NAICS Definition:Construction
Employees:11,125
Subsidiaries:10
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Gateley Vinden

Gateley Vinden

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
ALEC Holdings

ALEC Holdings

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Gateley Vinden in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ALEC Holdings in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Gateley Vinden (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Gateley Vinden cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - ALEC Holdings (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ALEC Holdings cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Gateley Vinden

Gateley Vinden

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
ALEC Holdings

ALEC Holdings

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Gateley Vinden company and ALEC Holdings company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Gateley Vinden company and ALEC Holdings company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Gateley Vinden company and ALEC Holdings company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Gateley Vinden company and ALEC Holdings company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Gateley Vinden company and ALEC Holdings company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Gateley Vinden company and ALEC Holdings company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Gateley Vinden company and ALEC Holdings company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Gateley Vinden company and ALEC Holdings company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Gateley Vinden company and ALEC Holdings company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Gateley Vinden company and ALEC Holdings company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Gateley Vinden company and ALEC Holdings company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Gateley Vinden and ALEC Holdings, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Gateley Vinden and ALEC Holdings, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Gateley Vinden or ALEC Holdings ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Gateley Vinden or ALEC Holdings ?
Between Gateley Vinden and ALEC Holdings, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Gateley Vinden and ALEC Holdings, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-85893
SUMMARY

Use after free in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-69486
SUMMARY

Heap-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2025-11395
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Podman. If an attacker can pass a crafted tar archive to the `podman load` command, they can create files on the host machine with the privileges of the user running Podman.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-92259
SUMMARY

Integer overflow or wraparound vulnerability in Samsung Opensource Escargot allows attackers with write access to the bytecode-cache directory to cause a heap-based buffer overflow and denial of service via a crafted cache file. This issue affects Escargot: ac94df78493ee6fede286620d94f724e46b4d238.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-92257
SUMMARY

Netcore NR255-V version 1.5.130703 contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in L7 content management pages that use eval() sinks, affecting the call board text and policy group handling components. Attackers can inject persistent script payloads through these pages to have malicious code executed in the context of other users viewing the affected content.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
2.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3