Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

gastrodat GmbHgastrodat GmbH
VS
MetaMeta
gastrodat GmbH

gastrodat GmbH

Karolingerstraße 3/1, Salzburg, 5020, AT

Last Update: 16/04/2026

View Profile
639/1000Poor

Simplify your hotel management and relieve your staff with our booking software. Daily recurring tasks determine the image of every tourist accommodation business. The all-in-one hotel software from gastrodat provides everything from a single source: * Hotel software: ...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:19
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
Meta

Meta

1 Hacker Way, Menlo Park, 94025, US

Last Update: 09/09/2026

View Profile
Between 600 and 649
https://www.metacareers.com/
639/1000Poor

Meta's mission is to build the future of human connection and the technology that makes it possible. Our technologies help people connect, find communities, and grow businesses. When Facebook launched in 2004, it changed the way people connect. Apps like Messenger, In...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:164,515
Subsidiaries:21
12-month incidents
8
Known data breaches
13
Attack type number
4

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
gastrodat GmbH

gastrodat GmbH

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Meta

Meta

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

gastrodat GmbH has 6.54% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

Meta has 676.7% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - gastrodat GmbH (X = Date, Y = Severity)

gastrodat GmbH cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Meta (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Meta cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
gastrodat GmbH

gastrodat GmbH

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
CHEGAS1776335039
Meta

Meta

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
GOOMICTREMET1788168069
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
MET1780302304
🔒 Incident : Breach
METORATICBANYAHATTADOAPPCOLGOO1777962591

FAQ

Between gastrodat GmbH company and Meta company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between gastrodat GmbH company and Meta company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between gastrodat GmbH company and Meta company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between gastrodat GmbH company and Meta company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between gastrodat GmbH company and Meta company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between gastrodat GmbH company and Meta company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between gastrodat GmbH company and Meta company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between gastrodat GmbH company and Meta company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between gastrodat GmbH company and Meta company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between gastrodat GmbH company and Meta company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between gastrodat GmbH company and Meta company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between gastrodat GmbH and Meta, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between gastrodat GmbH and Meta, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - gastrodat GmbH or Meta ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - gastrodat GmbH or Meta ?
Between gastrodat GmbH and Meta, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between gastrodat GmbH and Meta, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-93436
SUMMARY

vLLM through 0.29.0 fails to properly clean up decode-side metadata for rejected inference requests in prefill/decode disaggregated deployments. Remote attackers can submit requests with max_tokens=0 to exhaust decode-worker memory without bound until the worker restarts.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-17
UPDATED
Date2026-09-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-93435
SUMMARY

redis-parser through 3.0.0 contains a denial of service vulnerability in the RESP protocol parser that allows malicious Redis endpoints to crash the client process through unbounded recursion on nested arrays. Attackers can send crafted RESP byte streams with repeated array headers that exhaust the V8 call stack, causing an uncaught RangeError that terminates the Node.js process without triggering error handling callbacks.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-17
UPDATED
Date2026-09-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-87701
SUMMARY

Improper neutralization of special elements in output used by a downstream component ('injection') in Azure Cosmos DB allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-17
UPDATED
Date2026-09-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.1
CVE-2026-85917
SUMMARY

Server-side request forgery (ssrf) in Azure AI Foundry allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-17
UPDATED
Date2026-09-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-85889
SUMMARY

Missing authentication for critical function in Azure AI Foundry allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-17
UPDATED
Date2026-09-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9