Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

GapGap
VS
BİM Birleşik Mağazalar A.ŞBİM Birleşik Mağazalar A.Ş
Gap

Gap

55 Thomas Street, New York, 10013, US

Last Update: 17/08/2026

View Profile
762/1000Fair

In 1969, Don and Doris Fisher opened the first Gap store on Ocean Avenue in San Francisco. They wanted to make it easier to find a great pair of jeans, and they did. Their denim and records store was a hit, and it grew to become one of the world’s most iconic brands. ...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:15,360
Subsidiaries:4
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1
BİM Birleşik Mağazalar A.Ş

BİM Birleşik Mağazalar A.Ş

Abdurrahmangazi Mah.Ebubekir Cad. No:73 Sancaktepe, İstanbul, TR

Last Update: 06/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.bim.com.tr
798/1000Fair

Türkiye’de perakende sektörünün lideri olan BİM Birleşik Mağazalar A.Ş., temel gıda ve tüketim malzemelerinin uygun fiyat ve yüksek kaliteyle tüketiciye ulaştırılması hedefiyle faaliyetlerine 1995 yılında 21 mağazayla başlamıştır. Yüksek indirim (hard-discount) modelini...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:13,526
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Gap

Gap

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
BİM Birleşik Mağazalar A.Ş

BİM Birleşik Mağazalar A.Ş

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

Gap has 46.24% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for BİM Birleşik Mağazalar A.Ş in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Gap (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Gap cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - BİM Birleşik Mağazalar A.Ş (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BİM Birleşik Mağazalar A.Ş cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Gap

Gap

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
HCLTAT1786448292
🔒 Incident : Breach
IHGHCLGAPWYNMCDVODKYNMIC1786975327
BİM Birleşik Mağazalar A.Ş

BİM Birleşik Mağazalar A.Ş

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Gap company and BİM Birleşik Mağazalar A.Ş company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Gap company and BİM Birleşik Mağazalar A.Ş company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Gap company and BİM Birleşik Mağazalar A.Ş company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Gap company and BİM Birleşik Mağazalar A.Ş company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Gap company and BİM Birleşik Mağazalar A.Ş company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Gap company and BİM Birleşik Mağazalar A.Ş company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Gap company and BİM Birleşik Mağazalar A.Ş company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Gap company and BİM Birleşik Mağazalar A.Ş company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Gap company and BİM Birleşik Mağazalar A.Ş company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Gap company and BİM Birleşik Mağazalar A.Ş company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Gap company and BİM Birleşik Mağazalar A.Ş company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Gap and BİM Birleşik Mağazalar A.Ş, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Gap and BİM Birleşik Mağazalar A.Ş, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Gap or BİM Birleşik Mağazalar A.Ş ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Gap or BİM Birleşik Mağazalar A.Ş ?
Between Gap and BİM Birleşik Mağazalar A.Ş, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Gap and BİM Birleşik Mağazalar A.Ş, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97032
SUMMARY

HTTP/2 servers could end up crashing due to inadvertently modifying its HPACK encoder concurrently. This happens because the server modifies the HPACK encoder from two goroutines without synchronization: one uses the encoder to encode a HEADERS frame as part of a response sent to a client and the other modifies the encoder's table size when handling a SETTINGS frame containing SETTINGS_HEADER_TABLE_SIZE that a client sends. A malicious client can repeatedly send a request while changing the header table size to crash the server.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97031
SUMMARY

Multiple ECH outer extension references are not permitted under RFC 9849; previously, a client could send a well-crafted packet that could trigger memory exhaustion in the server process by specifying multiple references. We now reject these as malformed and curb the memory amplification vector as a result.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97030
SUMMARY

A trusted template author may have previously written a valid template wherein the use of the 'yield' keyword would not be correctly escaped. We now ensure that valid keyword uses are escaped and non-keyword uses are not escaped.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96207
SUMMARY

Improper certificate validation in Microsoft Partner Center allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-94510
SUMMARY

Authorization bypass through user-controlled key in Microsoft Bookings allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:H/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
5.3
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9