Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Massdiscounters t/a Game and DionwiredMassdiscounters t/a Game and Dionwired
VS
ZalandoZalando
Massdiscounters t/a Game and Dionwired

Massdiscounters t/a Game and Dionwired

16 Fredman Dr, Johannesburg, 2196, ZA

Last Update: 31/12/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.game.co.za
776/1000Fair

Game is a trusted brand with a 51-year heritage of delivering the best value on quality merchandise for African consumers, through its 118 stores in South Africa and 28 throughout the rest of Africa. Since its inception in 1970, Game has been focused on providing its cu...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:1,521
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Zalando

Zalando

Valeska-Gert-Straße 5, Berlin, 10243, DE

Last Update: 10/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://jobs.zalando.com
791/1000Fair

Welcome to Zalando. Here’s some key info about us: Our position and vision: - We’re Europe’s leading online platform for fashion and lifestyle. - Founded in Berlin in 2008, we bring head-to-toe fashion to more than 50 million active customers in 25 markets; offering cl...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:12,942
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Massdiscounters t/a Game and Dionwired

Massdiscounters t/a Game and Dionwired

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Zalando

Zalando

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Massdiscounters t/a Game and Dionwired in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Zalando in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Massdiscounters t/a Game and Dionwired (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Massdiscounters t/a Game and Dionwired cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Zalando (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Zalando cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Massdiscounters t/a Game and Dionwired

Massdiscounters t/a Game and Dionwired

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Zalando

Zalando

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Massdiscounters t/a Game and Dionwired company and Zalando company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Massdiscounters t/a Game and Dionwired company and Zalando company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Massdiscounters t/a Game and Dionwired company and Zalando company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Massdiscounters t/a Game and Dionwired company and Zalando company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Massdiscounters t/a Game and Dionwired company and Zalando company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Massdiscounters t/a Game and Dionwired company and Zalando company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Massdiscounters t/a Game and Dionwired company and Zalando company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Massdiscounters t/a Game and Dionwired company and Zalando company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Massdiscounters t/a Game and Dionwired company and Zalando company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Massdiscounters t/a Game and Dionwired company and Zalando company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Massdiscounters t/a Game and Dionwired company and Zalando company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Massdiscounters t/a Game and Dionwired and Zalando, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Massdiscounters t/a Game and Dionwired and Zalando, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Massdiscounters t/a Game and Dionwired or Zalando ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Massdiscounters t/a Game and Dionwired or Zalando ?
Between Massdiscounters t/a Game and Dionwired and Zalando, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Massdiscounters t/a Game and Dionwired and Zalando, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-94426
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was determined in xuxueli xxl-job up to 3.5.0. The impacted element is an unknown function of the file /jobgroup/insert. This manipulation of the argument Name causes cross site scripting. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-21
UPDATED
Date2026-09-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.5)
CVSS2
Base Score: 4.0
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:N/I:P/A:N
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-94425
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was found in Moore Threads MTT S80 Driver Package 340.150. The affected element is the function sub_140006F0C in the library mtdispkm64.sys of the component IOCTL Handler. The manipulation results in improper privilege management. Attacking locally is a requirement. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-21
UPDATED
Date2026-09-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS2
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
AV:L/AC:L/Au:S/C:C/I:C/A:C
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2
CVE-2026-94627
SUMMARY

vLLM Mooncake connector through 0.29.0 fails to properly manage GPU KV cache block ownership when concurrent child requests share a single transfer ID in prefill/decode disaggregated deployments. Attackers can trigger GPU memory exhaustion by submitting completion requests with multiple prompts, causing orphaned KV cache blocks to accumulate until process restart and eventually preventing legitimate requests from executing.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-21
UPDATED
Date2026-09-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-94626
SUMMARY

vLLM through 0.29.0 fails to validate the tp_size parameter in kv_transfer_params on OpenAI-compatible completion endpoints, allowing attackers to allocate unbounded memory. Attackers can supply arbitrary tp_size values in prefill/decode disaggregated deployments to exhaust memory and trigger kernel OOM-kill of the decode worker process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-21
UPDATED
Date2026-09-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-94625
SUMMARY

vLLM through 0.29.0 contains a resource exhaustion vulnerability in MooncakeConnector where rejected prefill requests create ownerless transfer placeholders that are never reclaimed. Attackers can send rejected requests to exhaust sender task pools, causing valid requests to be delayed by up to 480 seconds while health checks continue returning success.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-21
UPDATED
Date2026-09-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9