Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Massdiscounters t/a Game and DionwiredMassdiscounters t/a Game and Dionwired
VS
Reliance DigitalReliance Digital
Massdiscounters t/a Game and Dionwired

Massdiscounters t/a Game and Dionwired

16 Fredman Dr, Johannesburg, 2196, ZA

Last Update: 31/12/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.game.co.za
776/1000Fair

Game is a trusted brand with a 51-year heritage of delivering the best value on quality merchandise for African consumers, through its 118 stores in South Africa and 28 throughout the rest of Africa. Since its inception in 1970, Game has been focused on providing its cu...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:1,521
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Reliance Digital

Reliance Digital

Reliance Digital, Navi Mumbai, IN

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
795/1000Fair

Reliance Digital is a Consumer Electronics, Durables, IT & Telecom retail arm of Reliance Retail Group with more than 1300+ stores across India. Reliance Digital seeks to fulfill the dream of every Indian, be it through its nationwide network of conveniently located...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:10,501
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Massdiscounters t/a Game and Dionwired

Massdiscounters t/a Game and Dionwired

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Reliance Digital

Reliance Digital

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Massdiscounters t/a Game and Dionwired in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Reliance Digital in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Massdiscounters t/a Game and Dionwired (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Massdiscounters t/a Game and Dionwired cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Reliance Digital (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Reliance Digital cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Massdiscounters t/a Game and Dionwired

Massdiscounters t/a Game and Dionwired

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Reliance Digital

Reliance Digital

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Massdiscounters t/a Game and Dionwired company and Reliance Digital company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Massdiscounters t/a Game and Dionwired company and Reliance Digital company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Massdiscounters t/a Game and Dionwired company and Reliance Digital company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Massdiscounters t/a Game and Dionwired company and Reliance Digital company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Massdiscounters t/a Game and Dionwired company and Reliance Digital company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Massdiscounters t/a Game and Dionwired company and Reliance Digital company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Massdiscounters t/a Game and Dionwired company and Reliance Digital company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Massdiscounters t/a Game and Dionwired company and Reliance Digital company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Massdiscounters t/a Game and Dionwired company and Reliance Digital company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Massdiscounters t/a Game and Dionwired company and Reliance Digital company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Massdiscounters t/a Game and Dionwired company and Reliance Digital company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Massdiscounters t/a Game and Dionwired and Reliance Digital, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Massdiscounters t/a Game and Dionwired and Reliance Digital, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Massdiscounters t/a Game and Dionwired or Reliance Digital ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Massdiscounters t/a Game and Dionwired or Reliance Digital ?
Between Massdiscounters t/a Game and Dionwired and Reliance Digital, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Massdiscounters t/a Game and Dionwired and Reliance Digital, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1