Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Gall & GallGall & Gall
VS
Marisa S.A.Marisa S.A.
Gall & Gall

Gall & Gall

Provincialeweg 11, Postbus 3130, 1500 HH, NL

Last Update: 27/01/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.gall.nl
773/1000Fair

Gall & Gall is een drankenspeciaalzaak waar je terecht kunt voor advies, uitstekende service en een uitgebreid en verrassend assortiment dranken. Wij staan voor verantwoord genieten en bieden dranken voor ieder moment, van alledaags, weekend tot feestelijk. Onze medewer...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:1,087
Subsidiaries:23
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Marisa S.A.

Marisa S.A.

Rua James Holland, 422 - Barra Funda, São Paulo, 01138-000, BR

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.marisa.com.br
805/1000Good

Marisa S.A. is the largest Brazilian department store chain specialized in women’s clothing based on the number of stores in Brazil. The Company’s business strategy and operations focus primarily on middle-lower income women between the ages of 20 and 35. The Company’s ...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:14,806
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Gall & Gall

Gall & Gall

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Marisa S.A.

Marisa S.A.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Gall & Gall in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Marisa S.A. in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Gall & Gall (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Gall & Gall cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Marisa S.A. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Marisa S.A. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Gall & Gall

Gall & Gall

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Marisa S.A.

Marisa S.A.

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Gall & Gall company and Marisa S.A. company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Gall & Gall company and Marisa S.A. company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Gall & Gall company and Marisa S.A. company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Gall & Gall company and Marisa S.A. company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Gall & Gall company and Marisa S.A. company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Gall & Gall company and Marisa S.A. company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Gall & Gall company and Marisa S.A. company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Gall & Gall company and Marisa S.A. company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Gall & Gall company and Marisa S.A. company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Gall & Gall company and Marisa S.A. company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Gall & Gall company and Marisa S.A. company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Gall & Gall and Marisa S.A., which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Gall & Gall and Marisa S.A., which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Gall & Gall or Marisa S.A. ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Gall & Gall or Marisa S.A. ?
Between Gall & Gall and Marisa S.A., which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Gall & Gall and Marisa S.A., which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67866
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Systerel S2OPC 1.7.3 allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via the LockedStaMac_ProcessMsg_DeleteMonitoredItemsResponse and SOPC_StaMac_NewDeleteMonitoredItems in the client wrapper DeleteMonitoredItems path

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-67863
SUMMARY

In open62541 1.5.5, a server-side use-after-free exists in the local MonitoredItem callback path. The issue occurs when UA_Subscription_localPublish continues to use the current UA_Notification after a callback invokes UA_Server_deleteMonitoredItem for the current local MonitoredItem. This allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-19026
SUMMARY

H5Z__filter_nbit in H5Znbit.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 dereferences cd_values[0] through cd_values[4] without validating that cd_values is non-NULL or that cd_nelmts is at least 5, the fixed size of the filter's header. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service via a crafted HDF5 file that stores the N-Bit filter pipeline message with zero client-data values, opened and read via H5Dread, e.g. by the h5ls or h5repack tools.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-19025
SUMMARY

H5O__layout_decode in H5Olayout.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 does not validate that a chunked dataset's stored chunk-layout dimensionality matches its dataspace rank when an existing dataset is opened, whereas this check is performed only at dataset-creation time. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service (divide-by-zero and application crash in H5S__hyper_iter_get_seq_list in src/H5Shyper.c) via a crafted HDF5 file with mismatched chunk/dataspace ranks that is opened and read via H5Dopen2 and H5Dread, e.g. by the h5repack tool.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA