Comparison Overview

Gainwell Technologies

VS

Ingram Micro

Gainwell Technologies

United States, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27

For 50 years, our nation’s federal Medicaid program has worked to improve the health, safety and well-being of America’s most vulnerable populations: low-income families, women and children, seniors, and those with disabilities. With positive health and cost outcomes that pierce inequities and impact economies, the success of these programs is inextricably tied to the prosperity of communities, individual states and the nation as a whole. We think that demands respect and, more importantly, is deserving of a lifetime commitment from innovators who can help those who operate within and around health and human services evolve — in any market at any stage. At Gainwell Technologies, that’s our sole focus. Built across more than five decades, Gainwell has intentionally seized opportunities to advance its digitally enabled services to meet agencies, health plans and MCOs where they are on their modernization journeys and propel them into the future of public health. Our commitment to innovation, deep experience and ability to leverage insights from customers across 50 states has allowed us to expand on next-generation, cloud-enabled technologies. Today, Gainwell offers one of the most comprehensive suites of scalable services and solutions on the market — all proven to deliver cost savings, better patient outcomes and an improved provider experience. Equally important to our expanding technologies and results: We bring ideas that bring policies to life.

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 10,068
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1

Ingram Micro

3351 Michelson Drive, Suite 100, None, Irvine, CA, US, 92612
Last Update: 2025-11-22

Ingram Micro is a leading technology company for the global information technology ecosystem. With the ability to reach nearly 90% of the global population, we play a vital role in the worldwide IT sales channel, bringing products and services from technology manufacturers and cloud providers to a highly diversified base of business-to-business technology experts. Through Ingram Micro Xvantage™, our AI-powered digital platform, we offer what we believe to be the industry’s first comprehensive business-to-consumer-like experience, integrating hardware and cloud subscriptions, personalized recommendations, instant pricing, order tracking, and billing automation. We also provide a broad range of technology services, including financing, specialized marketing, and lifecycle management, as well as technical pre- and post-sales professional support. Learn more at www.ingrammicro.com.

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 28,653
Subsidiaries: 15
12-month incidents
3
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gainwell-technologies.jpeg
Gainwell Technologies
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ingram-micro.jpeg
Ingram Micro
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Gainwell Technologies
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Ingram Micro
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Gainwell Technologies in 2025.

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

Ingram Micro has 455.56% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — Gainwell Technologies (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Gainwell Technologies cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Ingram Micro (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ingram Micro cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gainwell-technologies.jpeg
Gainwell Technologies
Incidents

Date Detected: 7/2024
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Social Engineering (Unauthorized Caller Access to Reimbursement Account)
Motivation: Unknown (Potential Financial or Data Theft)
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 01/2021
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ingram-micro.jpeg
Ingram Micro
Incidents

Date Detected: 7/2025
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: Extortion
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 7/2025
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: financial extortion (presumed)
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 7/2025
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Undisclosed attack vectors, DLL side-loading techniques, Process hollowing techniques
Motivation: Financial gain
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Gainwell Technologies company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Ingram Micro company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Ingram Micro company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Gainwell Technologies company.

In the current year, Ingram Micro company has reported more cyber incidents than Gainwell Technologies company.

Ingram Micro company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Gainwell Technologies company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Gainwell Technologies company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Ingram Micro company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Ingram Micro company nor Gainwell Technologies company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Gainwell Technologies company nor Ingram Micro company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Gainwell Technologies nor Ingram Micro holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Ingram Micro company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Gainwell Technologies company.

Ingram Micro company employs more people globally than Gainwell Technologies company, reflecting its scale as a IT Services and IT Consulting.

Neither Gainwell Technologies nor Ingram Micro holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Gainwell Technologies nor Ingram Micro holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Gainwell Technologies nor Ingram Micro holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Gainwell Technologies nor Ingram Micro holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Gainwell Technologies nor Ingram Micro holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Gainwell Technologies nor Ingram Micro holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H