Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

가비아 (Gabia)가비아 (Gabia)
VS
inDriveinDrive
가비아 (Gabia)

가비아 (Gabia)

Daewangpankyo-ro 660 Bundang-gu, Uspace 1B 4F, Sungnam-si, Kyungki-do, KR, 463-400

Last Update: 28/09/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
http://careers.gabia.com
678/1000Weak

가비아 제1의 가치는 자주성입니다. 가비아의 모든 서비스는 가비아인이 직접 만듭니다.  도메인 등록법을 독학해, 1998년 국내 최초로 도메인 사업을 시작했고, 2008년에는 가비아만의 원천 기술로 기업용 메일을 만들었습니다. 그리고 20여 명의 개발자가 3년을 연구해 2013년 g클라우드를 출시했습니다. 개발된 서비스를 운영하고 안전하게 지키는 일도 우리 힘으로 합니다.  그렇게 24년간 100만여 고객을 직접 맞이했고,  도메인 시장점유율 1위, 하이웍스 시장점유율 1위,...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:212
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
inDrive

inDrive

Mountain View, 94040, US

Last Update: 03/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.inDrive.com
782/1000Fair

inDrive is a global mobility and urban services platform. The inDrive app has been downloaded over 400 million times, and has been the second most downloaded mobility app for the third consecutive year. In addition to ride-hailing, inDrive provides an expanding list of ...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:10,675
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
가비아 (Gabia)

가비아 (Gabia)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
inDrive

inDrive

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

가비아 (Gabia) has 32.43% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for inDrive in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - 가비아 (Gabia) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

가비아 (Gabia) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - inDrive (X = Date, Y = Severity)

inDrive cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
가비아 (Gabia)

가비아 (Gabia)

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
GAB1790591686
inDrive

inDrive

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between 가비아 (Gabia) company and inDrive company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between 가비아 (Gabia) company and inDrive company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between 가비아 (Gabia) company and inDrive company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between 가비아 (Gabia) company and inDrive company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between 가비아 (Gabia) company and inDrive company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between 가비아 (Gabia) company and inDrive company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between 가비아 (Gabia) company and inDrive company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between 가비아 (Gabia) company and inDrive company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between 가비아 (Gabia) company and inDrive company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between 가비아 (Gabia) company and inDrive company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between 가비아 (Gabia) company and inDrive company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between 가비아 (Gabia) and inDrive, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between 가비아 (Gabia) and inDrive, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - 가비아 (Gabia) or inDrive ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - 가비아 (Gabia) or inDrive ?
Between 가비아 (Gabia) and inDrive, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between 가비아 (Gabia) and inDrive, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97032
SUMMARY

HTTP/2 servers could end up crashing due to inadvertently modifying its HPACK encoder concurrently. This happens because the server modifies the HPACK encoder from two goroutines without synchronization: one uses the encoder to encode a HEADERS frame as part of a response sent to a client and the other modifies the encoder's table size when handling a SETTINGS frame containing SETTINGS_HEADER_TABLE_SIZE that a client sends. A malicious client can repeatedly send a request while changing the header table size to crash the server.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97031
SUMMARY

Multiple ECH outer extension references are not permitted under RFC 9849; previously, a client could send a well-crafted packet that could trigger memory exhaustion in the server process by specifying multiple references. We now reject these as malformed and curb the memory amplification vector as a result.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97030
SUMMARY

A trusted template author may have previously written a valid template wherein the use of the 'yield' keyword would not be correctly escaped. We now ensure that valid keyword uses are escaped and non-keyword uses are not escaped.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96207
SUMMARY

Improper certificate validation in Microsoft Partner Center allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-94510
SUMMARY

Authorization bypass through user-controlled key in Microsoft Bookings allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:H/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
5.3
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9