Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

g2m Dağıtım Pazarlama ve Tic. A.Ş.g2m Dağıtım Pazarlama ve Tic. A.Ş.
VS
Perfetti Van MellePerfetti Van Melle
g2m Dağıtım Pazarlama ve Tic. A.Ş.

g2m Dağıtım Pazarlama ve Tic. A.Ş.

Altunizade Mah.Kuşbakışı Cad.No:19 Üsküdar / İstanbul, İstanbul, 34662, TR

Last Update: 31/12/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.g2m.com.tr
764/1000Fair

g2m olarak, 40 yılı aşkın Ev Dışı Tüketim (EDT) sektörü tecrübemiz ve 6.000’in üzerinde ürün çeşidimizle, sektörün önde gelen üreticileri ve işletmeleri arasında köprü görevi görüyor, işletmelerin ihtiyaç duyduğu her türlü gıda ve gıda dışı sarf ürünlerinin satış, tedar...

NAICS:722
NAICS Definition:Food Services and Drinking Places
Employees:388
Subsidiaries:14
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Perfetti Van Melle

Perfetti Van Melle

Stationsplein ZW 997, SCHIPHOL OOST, 1117 CE, NL

Last Update: 14/09/2026

View Profile
798/1000Fair

Perfetti Van Melle is a privately owned company, producing and distributing candies and chewing gums in more than 150 countries worldwide. Employing over 17.000 people and operating 37 companies throughout the world, Perfetti Van Melle has a true global reach: it is p...

NAICS:722
NAICS Definition:Food Services and Drinking Places
Employees:11,469
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
g2m Dağıtım Pazarlama ve Tic. A.Ş.

g2m Dağıtım Pazarlama ve Tic. A.Ş.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Perfetti Van Melle

Perfetti Van Melle

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for g2m Dağıtım Pazarlama ve Tic. A.Ş. in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Perfetti Van Melle in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - g2m Dağıtım Pazarlama ve Tic. A.Ş. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

g2m Dağıtım Pazarlama ve Tic. A.Ş. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Perfetti Van Melle (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Perfetti Van Melle cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
g2m Dağıtım Pazarlama ve Tic. A.Ş.

g2m Dağıtım Pazarlama ve Tic. A.Ş.

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Perfetti Van Melle

Perfetti Van Melle

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between g2m Dağıtım Pazarlama ve Tic. A.Ş. company and Perfetti Van Melle company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between g2m Dağıtım Pazarlama ve Tic. A.Ş. company and Perfetti Van Melle company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between g2m Dağıtım Pazarlama ve Tic. A.Ş. company and Perfetti Van Melle company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between g2m Dağıtım Pazarlama ve Tic. A.Ş. company and Perfetti Van Melle company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between g2m Dağıtım Pazarlama ve Tic. A.Ş. company and Perfetti Van Melle company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between g2m Dağıtım Pazarlama ve Tic. A.Ş. company and Perfetti Van Melle company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between g2m Dağıtım Pazarlama ve Tic. A.Ş. company and Perfetti Van Melle company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between g2m Dağıtım Pazarlama ve Tic. A.Ş. company and Perfetti Van Melle company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between g2m Dağıtım Pazarlama ve Tic. A.Ş. company and Perfetti Van Melle company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between g2m Dağıtım Pazarlama ve Tic. A.Ş. company and Perfetti Van Melle company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between g2m Dağıtım Pazarlama ve Tic. A.Ş. company and Perfetti Van Melle company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between g2m Dağıtım Pazarlama ve Tic. A.Ş. and Perfetti Van Melle, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between g2m Dağıtım Pazarlama ve Tic. A.Ş. and Perfetti Van Melle, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - g2m Dağıtım Pazarlama ve Tic. A.Ş. or Perfetti Van Melle ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - g2m Dağıtım Pazarlama ve Tic. A.Ş. or Perfetti Van Melle ?
Between g2m Dağıtım Pazarlama ve Tic. A.Ş. and Perfetti Van Melle, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between g2m Dağıtım Pazarlama ve Tic. A.Ş. and Perfetti Van Melle, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-112112
SUMMARY

An IPv6 FlowSpec validation bypass in the CZ.NIC BIRD Internet Routing Daemon allows an established BGP peer to inject FlowSpec rules matching destinations outside the address space authorized by the unicast-route validation procedure. With validation enabled on the receiving flow6 channel, BIRD fails to reject a destination prefix component with a nonzero offset, contrary to RFC 8956 section 5. It validates a reconstructed prefix with zero-filled skipped bits, although the original FlowSpec component can match a broader set of IPv6 addresses. Given a suitable unicast route from the peer, the rule can pass validation and, where export policy permits, be propagated to downstream peers. Downstream enforcement may cause unauthorized traffic filtering or redirection.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-18
UPDATED
Date2026-10-18
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-112111
SUMMARY

The Bootstrap Shortcodes plugin for WordPress before 3.4.6 is vulnerable to stored XSS via the id attribute of the [bs_tcontent] shortcode. The bs_tcontent() shortcode handler in inc/bs_tabs.php emits the id attribute value into an unquoted HTML attribute. esc_attr() is applied, but it does not encode space characters, so a space in the supplied value terminates the attribute and any following text is parsed as additional HTML attributes, including JavaScript event handlers. This allows authenticated attackers with Contributor-level access and above to inject arbitrary web script that executes in the browser of any user who views the page and interacts with the injected element.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-18
UPDATED
Date2026-10-18
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-112029
SUMMARY

A vulnerability has been found in diem-project diem up to 5.1.3. This affects an unknown part of the file lib/model/doctrine/PluginDmUser.class.php of the component SHA1 Handler. Such manipulation of the argument salt/password leads to password hash with insufficient computational effort. The attack needs to be performed locally. The attack requires a high level of complexity. It is indicated that the exploitability is difficult. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-18
UPDATED
Date2026-10-18
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 2.5)
CVSS2
Base Score: 1.0
Complexity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:S/C:P/I:N/A:N
CVSS3
Base Score: 2.5
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 1.1
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:H/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
1
CVE-2026-112028
SUMMARY

A flaw has been found in light0011 cms c774dce31c6df0055568a8d5c53d964d99be199d/f72cf46f601efb2a0618c3814cc2f61380b38930. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the file App/Home/Controller/VoteController.class.php of the component Vote Handler. This manipulation of the argument X-Requested-With causes business logic errors. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been published and may be used. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-18
UPDATED
Date2026-10-18
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS2
Base Score: 6.4
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-112027
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was detected in light0011 cms c774dce31c6df0055568a8d5c53d964d99be199d/f72cf46f601efb2a0618c3814cc2f61380b38930. Affected by this vulnerability is the function file_exists of the file Public/Home/js/uploadify/check-exists.php of the component Uploadify. The manipulation of the argument filename results in file and directory information exposure. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit is now public and may be used. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-18
UPDATED
Date2026-10-18
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 5.0
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9