Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

g2m Dağıtım Pazarlama ve Tic. A.Ş.g2m Dağıtım Pazarlama ve Tic. A.Ş.
VS
Krispy KremeKrispy Kreme
g2m Dağıtım Pazarlama ve Tic. A.Ş.

g2m Dağıtım Pazarlama ve Tic. A.Ş.

Altunizade Mah.Kuşbakışı Cad.No:19 Üsküdar / İstanbul, İstanbul, 34662, TR

Last Update: 31/12/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.g2m.com.tr
764/1000Fair

g2m olarak, 40 yılı aşkın Ev Dışı Tüketim (EDT) sektörü tecrübemiz ve 6.000’in üzerinde ürün çeşidimizle, sektörün önde gelen üreticileri ve işletmeleri arasında köprü görevi görüyor, işletmelerin ihtiyaç duyduğu her türlü gıda ve gıda dışı sarf ürünlerinin satış, tedar...

NAICS:722
NAICS Definition:Food Services and Drinking Places
Employees:388
Subsidiaries:14
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Krispy Kreme

Krispy Kreme

2116 Hawkins St, Charlotte, North Carolina, US, 28203

Last Update: 27/05/2026

View Profile
350/1000Critical

Headquartered in Charlotte, N.C., Krispy Kreme is one of the most beloved and well-known sweet treat brands in the world. Our iconic Original Glazed® doughnut is universally recognized for its hot-off-the-line, melt-in-your-mouth experience. Krispy Kreme operates in mor...

NAICS:722
NAICS Definition:Food Services and Drinking Places
Employees:10,305
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
4
Attack type number
3

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
g2m Dağıtım Pazarlama ve Tic. A.Ş.

g2m Dağıtım Pazarlama ve Tic. A.Ş.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Krispy Kreme

Krispy Kreme

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for g2m Dağıtım Pazarlama ve Tic. A.Ş. in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Services Industry Avg (This Year)

Krispy Kreme has 2.91% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - g2m Dağıtım Pazarlama ve Tic. A.Ş. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

g2m Dağıtım Pazarlama ve Tic. A.Ş. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Krispy Kreme (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Krispy Kreme cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
g2m Dağıtım Pazarlama ve Tic. A.Ş.

g2m Dağıtım Pazarlama ve Tic. A.Ş.

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Krispy Kreme

Krispy Kreme

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
KRI1779668812
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
KRI1768390561
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
KRI5093650100125

FAQ

Between g2m Dağıtım Pazarlama ve Tic. A.Ş. company and Krispy Kreme company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between g2m Dağıtım Pazarlama ve Tic. A.Ş. company and Krispy Kreme company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between g2m Dağıtım Pazarlama ve Tic. A.Ş. company and Krispy Kreme company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between g2m Dağıtım Pazarlama ve Tic. A.Ş. company and Krispy Kreme company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between g2m Dağıtım Pazarlama ve Tic. A.Ş. company and Krispy Kreme company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between g2m Dağıtım Pazarlama ve Tic. A.Ş. company and Krispy Kreme company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between g2m Dağıtım Pazarlama ve Tic. A.Ş. company and Krispy Kreme company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between g2m Dağıtım Pazarlama ve Tic. A.Ş. company and Krispy Kreme company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between g2m Dağıtım Pazarlama ve Tic. A.Ş. company and Krispy Kreme company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between g2m Dağıtım Pazarlama ve Tic. A.Ş. company and Krispy Kreme company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between g2m Dağıtım Pazarlama ve Tic. A.Ş. company and Krispy Kreme company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between g2m Dağıtım Pazarlama ve Tic. A.Ş. and Krispy Kreme, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between g2m Dağıtım Pazarlama ve Tic. A.Ş. and Krispy Kreme, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - g2m Dağıtım Pazarlama ve Tic. A.Ş. or Krispy Kreme ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - g2m Dağıtım Pazarlama ve Tic. A.Ş. or Krispy Kreme ?
Between g2m Dağıtım Pazarlama ve Tic. A.Ş. and Krispy Kreme, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between g2m Dağıtım Pazarlama ve Tic. A.Ş. and Krispy Kreme, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-86150
SUMMARY

A security vulnerability has been detected in Tenda CP3 27.5.57.101. Impacted is an unknown function of the file custom-x/softap/hostapd. Such manipulation of the argument wpa_passphrase leads to hard-coded credentials. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-05
UPDATED
Date2026-09-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.1)
CVSS2
Base Score: 3.3
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:M/C:P/I:N/A:N
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3
CVE-2026-86149
SUMMARY

A weakness has been identified in Tenda CP3 27.5.57.101. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file Net/NetCheckPing.cpp. This manipulation of the argument interface_name/host causes os command injection. The attack can be initiated remotely.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-05
UPDATED
Date2026-09-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS2
Base Score: 8.3
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:M/C:C/I:C/A:C
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3
CVE-2026-86148
SUMMARY

A security flaw has been discovered in Tenda CP3 27.5.57.101. This vulnerability affects the function SystemAsh of the file Apis/system.c of the component Kylin. The manipulation of the argument AlarmVoiceURL results in os command injection. It is possible to launch the attack remotely.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-05
UPDATED
Date2026-09-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS2
Base Score: 8.3
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:M/C:C/I:C/A:C
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3
CVE-2026-86206
SUMMARY

A vulnerability in the N-central internal API access control filter allows unauthorised access to internal APIs. This is fixed in N-central 2026.3 HF3 and 2026.4

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-05
UPDATED
Date2026-09-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-86060
SUMMARY

RouterOS contains an argument-handling flaw in the SSH login path involving usernames that begin with a prohibited character, allowing for the trusted RouterOS policy mask to be changed, leading to privilege escalation. Exploitation requires an unauthenticated SSH session to reach the RouterOS login helper.This issue was fixed in versions: 6.49.21 (Long-term), 7.23.4 (Long-term) and 7.24.2 (Stable)

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-05
UPDATED
Date2026-09-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA