Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

g2m Dağıtım Pazarlama ve Tic. A.Ş.g2m Dağıtım Pazarlama ve Tic. A.Ş.
VS
GoTo FoodsGoTo Foods
g2m Dağıtım Pazarlama ve Tic. A.Ş.

g2m Dağıtım Pazarlama ve Tic. A.Ş.

Altunizade Mah.Kuşbakışı Cad.No:19 Üsküdar / İstanbul, İstanbul, 34662, TR

Last Update: 31/12/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.g2m.com.tr
764/1000Fair

g2m olarak, 40 yılı aşkın Ev Dışı Tüketim (EDT) sektörü tecrübemiz ve 6.000’in üzerinde ürün çeşidimizle, sektörün önde gelen üreticileri ve işletmeleri arasında köprü görevi görüyor, işletmelerin ihtiyaç duyduğu her türlü gıda ve gıda dışı sarf ürünlerinin satış, tedar...

NAICS:722
NAICS Definition:Food Services and Drinking Places
Employees:388
Subsidiaries:14
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
GoTo Foods

GoTo Foods

5620 Glenridge Drive, Atlanta, GA, US, 30342

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.gotofoods.com
774/1000Fair

Atlanta-based platform company GoTo Foods (formerly known as Focus Brands) is a leading developer of global multi-channel foodservice brands. As of December 28 , 2025, GoTo Foods, through its affiliate brands, is the franchisor and operator of over 7,300 restaurants, ca...

NAICS:722
NAICS Definition:Food Services and Drinking Places
Employees:19,780
Subsidiaries:7
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
g2m Dağıtım Pazarlama ve Tic. A.Ş.

g2m Dağıtım Pazarlama ve Tic. A.Ş.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
GoTo Foods

GoTo Foods

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for g2m Dağıtım Pazarlama ve Tic. A.Ş. in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for GoTo Foods in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - g2m Dağıtım Pazarlama ve Tic. A.Ş. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

g2m Dağıtım Pazarlama ve Tic. A.Ş. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - GoTo Foods (X = Date, Y = Severity)

GoTo Foods cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
g2m Dağıtım Pazarlama ve Tic. A.Ş.

g2m Dağıtım Pazarlama ve Tic. A.Ş.

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
GoTo Foods

GoTo Foods

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
GOT724082025

FAQ

Between g2m Dağıtım Pazarlama ve Tic. A.Ş. company and GoTo Foods company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between g2m Dağıtım Pazarlama ve Tic. A.Ş. company and GoTo Foods company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between g2m Dağıtım Pazarlama ve Tic. A.Ş. company and GoTo Foods company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between g2m Dağıtım Pazarlama ve Tic. A.Ş. company and GoTo Foods company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between g2m Dağıtım Pazarlama ve Tic. A.Ş. company and GoTo Foods company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between g2m Dağıtım Pazarlama ve Tic. A.Ş. company and GoTo Foods company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between g2m Dağıtım Pazarlama ve Tic. A.Ş. company and GoTo Foods company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between g2m Dağıtım Pazarlama ve Tic. A.Ş. company and GoTo Foods company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between g2m Dağıtım Pazarlama ve Tic. A.Ş. company and GoTo Foods company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between g2m Dağıtım Pazarlama ve Tic. A.Ş. company and GoTo Foods company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between g2m Dağıtım Pazarlama ve Tic. A.Ş. company and GoTo Foods company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between g2m Dağıtım Pazarlama ve Tic. A.Ş. and GoTo Foods, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between g2m Dağıtım Pazarlama ve Tic. A.Ş. and GoTo Foods, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - g2m Dağıtım Pazarlama ve Tic. A.Ş. or GoTo Foods ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - g2m Dağıtım Pazarlama ve Tic. A.Ş. or GoTo Foods ?
Between g2m Dağıtım Pazarlama ve Tic. A.Ş. and GoTo Foods, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between g2m Dağıtım Pazarlama ve Tic. A.Ş. and GoTo Foods, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-19961
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was detected in Edimax EW-7478APC 1.04. Affected is the function formWlSiteSurvey of the file /goform/formWlSiteSurvey. Performing a manipulation of the argument selSSID results in buffer overflow. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The exploit is now public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-16
UPDATED
Date2026-08-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.9)
CVSS2
Base Score: 9.0
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:C/I:C/A:C
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.1
CVE-2026-19960
SUMMARY

A security vulnerability has been detected in Edimax EW-7478APC 1.04. This impacts the function formWlbasic of the file /goform/formWlbasic. Such manipulation of the argument rootAPmac leads to command injection. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-16
UPDATED
Date2026-08-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS2
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:L/SI:L/SA:L/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.7
EXPLOITABILITY
3.1
CVE-2026-19959
SUMMARY

A weakness has been identified in Edimax EW-7478APC 1.04. This affects the function formWanTcpipSetup of the file /goform/formWanTcpipSetup. This manipulation of the argument pppUserName causes stack-based buffer overflow. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be used for attacks. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-16
UPDATED
Date2026-08-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.9)
CVSS2
Base Score: 9.0
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:C/I:C/A:C
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.1
CVE-2026-19958
SUMMARY

A security flaw has been discovered in iatsiuk pptr-mcp up to 0.2.7. The impacted element is the function executeCode of the file src/vm-executor.ts of the component execute Tool. The manipulation results in code injection. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-16
UPDATED
Date2026-08-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-19957
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was identified in graphlit graphlit-mcp-server 1.0.1. This affects the function fetch of the file src/tools.ts of the component ssrf-test Endpoint. Such manipulation of the argument url leads to server-side request forgery. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-16
UPDATED
Date2026-08-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8