Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

G&S Bouw b.v.G&S Bouw b.v.
VS
Royal BAM GroupRoyal BAM Group
G&S Bouw b.v.

G&S Bouw b.v.

Paasheuvelweg 31, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, 1105 BG, NL

Last Update: 03/11/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.gensbouw.nl
750/1000Fair

G&S Bouw is een bouwbedrijf dat gespecialiseerd is in hoogwaardige utiliteitsbouw (kantoren en bedrijfsgebouwen). We zijn een compact en flexibel bedrijf met een sterke kern van eigen mensen. We pakken de regie-rol die nodig is om kwalitatief hoogstaande gebouwen te rea...

NAICS:23
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:41
Subsidiaries:73
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Royal BAM Group

Royal BAM Group

Runnenburg 9, Bunnik, NL, 3981 AZ

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.bam.com/
773/1000Fair

🏗️ Building a sustainable tomorrow at BAM! As leaders in the construction industry, we are committed to pioneering sustainable practices that not only enhance our projects but also contribute to a better future for generations to come. Our strategy revolves around f...

NAICS:23
NAICS Definition:Construction
Employees:15,560
Subsidiaries:22
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
G&S Bouw b.v.

G&S Bouw b.v.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Royal BAM Group

Royal BAM Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for G&S Bouw b.v. in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Royal BAM Group in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - G&S Bouw b.v. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

G&S Bouw b.v. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Royal BAM Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Royal BAM Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
G&S Bouw b.v.

G&S Bouw b.v.

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Royal BAM Group

Royal BAM Group

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between G&S Bouw b.v. company and Royal BAM Group company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between G&S Bouw b.v. company and Royal BAM Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between G&S Bouw b.v. company and Royal BAM Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between G&S Bouw b.v. company and Royal BAM Group company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between G&S Bouw b.v. company and Royal BAM Group company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between G&S Bouw b.v. company and Royal BAM Group company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between G&S Bouw b.v. company and Royal BAM Group company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between G&S Bouw b.v. company and Royal BAM Group company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between G&S Bouw b.v. company and Royal BAM Group company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between G&S Bouw b.v. company and Royal BAM Group company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between G&S Bouw b.v. company and Royal BAM Group company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between G&S Bouw b.v. and Royal BAM Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between G&S Bouw b.v. and Royal BAM Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - G&S Bouw b.v. or Royal BAM Group ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - G&S Bouw b.v. or Royal BAM Group ?
Between G&S Bouw b.v. and Royal BAM Group, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between G&S Bouw b.v. and Royal BAM Group, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-56785
SUMMARY

FlatPress versions prior to commit 10be83c, contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in comment and contact forms where name, URL, and email fields are rendered without proper output encoding in Smarty templates. Attackers can inject arbitrary HTML and JavaScript through these fields to execute malicious scripts in browsers of viewers including administrators, or bypass URL scheme validation to inject javascript: or data: URIs.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-54588
SUMMARY

Poweradmin is a web-based DNS administration tool for PowerDNS server. Versions prior to 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 use the attacker-controlled `HTTP_HOST` request header as the authoritative source for building callback URLs in its OIDC, SAML, and logout authentication flows without any validation. An unauthenticated attacker can poison the `redirect_uri` sent to the Identity Provider, causing the IdP to redirect the victim's authorization code to an attacker-controlled server - resulting in full account takeover with no credentials required. Versions 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 patch the issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-48493
SUMMARY

Snipe-IT is an IT asset/license management system. In versions prior to 8.6.0, a user with only users.edit can send a PATCH to /api/v1/users/{their_own_id} and grant themselves any permission except admin and superuser — for example `assets.view`, `assets.create`, `reports.view`, import, etc. The issue is patched in version 8.6.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
1.2
CVE-2026-47693
SUMMARY

Poweradmin is a web-based DNS administration tool for PowerDNS server. Versions prior to 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 are vulnerable to CSV Injection (Formula Injection) in its log export functionality. User-controlled data — specifically the username field — is written to exported CSV files without sanitizing formula trigger characters (=, +, -, @). When an administrator exports activity logs and opens the resulting CSV in a spreadsheet application (Microsoft Excel, LibreOffice Calc, Google Sheets), any formula stored in a username is executed by the application. This can be used for phishing attacks against administrators or data exfiltration. Versions 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 patch the issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
1.7
CVE-2026-12164
SUMMARY

Fortra File Integrity Monitoring (FIM), formerly Tripwire Enterprise, versions prior to 9.4.0 may assign incorrect or elevated effective permissions to users created by the tetool import command while FIM is running, particularly when the import also creates or changes roles or role-permission relationships.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
0.8