Comparison Overview

FWD Insurance

VS

Allstate

FWD Insurance

13/F, City Plaza 3, 14 Taikoo Wan Road, Quarry Bay, _, HK
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

FWD Group (1828.HK) is a pan-Asian life and health insurance business that serves approximately 34 million customers across 10 markets, including BRI Life in Indonesia. FWD’s customer-led and tech-enabled approach aims to deliver innovative propositions, easy-to-understand products and a simpler insurance experience. Established in 2013, the company operates in some of the fastest-growing insurance markets in the world with a vision of changing the way people feel about insurance. FWD Group is listed on the main board of the Hong Kong Stock Exchange under the stock code 1828.

NAICS: 524
NAICS Definition: Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees: 10,743
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Allstate

3100 Sanders Rd, None, Northbrook, Illinois, US, 60062
Last Update: 2025-11-25
Between 700 and 749

At Allstate, we're advocates for peace of mind and a good life. And that comes through in everything we do. From building innovative teams that truly understand our customers' needs, to challenging each other to develop our careers in a meaningful way, and finally to the incredible results we're able to achieve together. See how we’re creating a better future through innovation, advocacy, and empowering people and communities.

NAICS: 524
NAICS Definition: Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees: 58,885
Subsidiaries: 23
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fwd-insurance.jpeg
FWD Insurance
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/allstate.jpeg
Allstate
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
FWD Insurance
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Allstate
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for FWD Insurance in 2025.

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Average (This Year)

Allstate has 49.25% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — FWD Insurance (X = Date, Y = Severity)

FWD Insurance cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Allstate (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Allstate cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fwd-insurance.jpeg
FWD Insurance
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/allstate.jpeg
Allstate
Incidents

Date Detected: 10/2025
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 1/2023
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 2/2020
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

FAQ

FWD Insurance company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Allstate company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Allstate company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas FWD Insurance company has not reported any.

In the current year, Allstate company has reported more cyber incidents than FWD Insurance company.

Neither Allstate company nor FWD Insurance company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Allstate company has disclosed at least one data breach, while FWD Insurance company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Allstate company nor FWD Insurance company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither FWD Insurance company nor Allstate company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither FWD Insurance nor Allstate holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Allstate company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to FWD Insurance company.

Allstate company employs more people globally than FWD Insurance company, reflecting its scale as a Insurance.

Neither FWD Insurance nor Allstate holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither FWD Insurance nor Allstate holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither FWD Insurance nor Allstate holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither FWD Insurance nor Allstate holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither FWD Insurance nor Allstate holds HIPAA certification.

Neither FWD Insurance nor Allstate holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.