Comparison Overview
Futurecom Systems Group ULC

Futurecom Systems Group ULC
3277 Langstaff Road, Concord, L4K 5P8, CA
Last Update: 27/01/2026
Futurecom was acquired by Motorola Solutions in 2022 and is now part of its ecosystem of safety and security technologies. Futurecom is a leading provider of radio coverage extension solutions for public safety agencies. It designs & manufactures in-vehicle, fixed and...

Ooredoo Group
100 West Bay, Doha, Doha, QA, Po Box 217
Last Update: 01/04/2026
We are an award-winning international communications company operating across the Middle East, North Africa and Southeast Asia. Serving consumers and businesses in 10 countries, we deliver a leading data experience through a broad range of content and services via ...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Futurecom Systems Group ULC







Ooredoo Group






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Futurecom Systems Group ULC in 2026.
Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Ooredoo Group in 2026.
Incident History - Futurecom Systems Group ULC (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Futurecom Systems Group ULC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Ooredoo Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Ooredoo Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Futurecom Systems Group ULC

Ooredoo Group
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
A vulnerability has been found in SourceCodester Simple Online Food Ordering System 1.0. This affects an unknown function of the file /admin/ajax.php?action=login2. The manipulation of the argument email leads to sql injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.
A flaw was found in the ipa_getkeytab module of the community.general Ansible collection. The module's bind_pw parameter, used to supply the LDAP simple-bind password when retrieving a Kerberos keytab, is not declared with no_log, unlike the sibling password parameter in the same module. As a consequence, the supplied IPA/LDAP bind password is recorded in cleartext in the managed host's system journal/syslog (the module's "Invoked with" record), is included in the module's return values and verbose (-v) output, and is displayed in Automation Controller / AWX job output. The password is additionally passed on the command line to the ipa-getkeytab helper (as --bindpw <value>), exposing it in the process list to local users while the command runs. An attacker able to read these logs, job output, or the process table can obtain the directory bind credential, potentially compromising the accounts and objects that credential can access.
The device metadata import interface /device/instance/{productId}/property-metadata/import of jetlinks community 2.11 is vulnerable to Server-side request forgery (SSRF).
disconf (Distributed Configuration Management Platform) 2.6.36 is vulnerable to Incorrect Access Control. The config-fetching APIs /api/config/item, /api/config/file, /api/config/list and /api/config/simple/list are exposed without authentication. The LoginInterceptor explicitly whitelists these four paths, so any anonymous attacker can read every configuration item and configuration file managed by the config center.
Funiture 1.0.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the backend tool interfaces /sys/tool/select.json and /sys/tool/update.json.