Comparison Overview
Futur

Futur
10 Place de la Joliette, Marseille Cedex 2, undefined, 13567, FR
Last Update: 20/11/2025
Société affiliée au groupe SFR, Futur propose aux PME depuis plus de 15 ans des solutions télécoms et informatiques. Présente sur tout le territoire français à travers 4 agences régionales, l’entreprise compte une centaine de collaborateurs, plus de 20.000 clients entre...

Telia
Stjärntorget 1, SOLNA, -, SE, SE-169 94
Last Update: 01/04/2026
Our 15 000 talented colleagues serve millions of customers every day in one of the world’s most connected regions. With a strong connectivity base, we’re the hub in the digital ecosystem, empowering people, companies and societies to stay in touch with everything that m...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Futur







Telia






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Futur in 2026.
Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)
Telia has 7.41% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - Futur (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Futur cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Telia (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Telia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Futur

Telia
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Fides is an open-source privacy engineering platform. From version 2.33.0 to before version 2.84.5, there is a DOM-based XSS vulnerability in fides.js via the fides_description override. This issue has been patched in version 2.84.5.
WACRM prior to commit 73041bf contain an authorization bypass vulnerability in the automation engine that allows authenticated attackers to access and modify contacts belonging to other tenants by supplying an arbitrary caller-controlled contact_id in the POST request body without tenant ownership verification. Attackers can exploit the service-role client that bypasses row-level security to modify victim contact fields including name, email, and company across tenant boundaries using only a known contact UUID.
Namespace attributes are not encoded correctly during HTML serialization. This allows bypassing the cross-site scripting prevention mechanism of typo3/html-sanitizer before version 2.3.2.
When ALLOW_INSECURE_RAW_TEXT is enabled, whitespace-variant closing tags (e.g., </style\t>) are not recognized by the sanitizer but accepted by browsers as valid end tags, allowing subsequent content to escape sanitization. This allows bypassing the cross-site scripting prevention mechanism of typo3/html-sanitizer before version 2.3.2.
Headplane is a feature-complete Web UI for Headscale. Prior to versions 0.6.3 and 0.7.0-beta.3, Headplane was vulnerable to a path traversal / authorization bypass in the Headscale API client used by node and user rename operations. This issue has been patched in versions 0.6.3 and 0.7.0-beta.3.