Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

FusionPKGFusionPKG
VS
The Estée Lauder Companies Inc.The Estée Lauder Companies Inc.
FusionPKG

FusionPKG

2608 Inwood Rd, Dallas, Texas 75235, US

Last Update: 07/05/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.fusionpkg.com
758/1000Fair

FusionPKG is a total solutions provider to the beauty industry. We offer a complete range of skincare and color cosmetics packaging, integrated turnkey solutions, and fully custom product and packaging capabilities. Through decades of experience redefining the standar...

NAICS:32562
NAICS Definition:Toilet Preparation Manufacturing
Employees:0
Subsidiaries:10
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
The Estée Lauder Companies Inc.

The Estée Lauder Companies Inc.

767 5th Ave, New York, NY, US, 10153

Last Update: 23/07/2026

View Profile
Between 550 and 599
http://www.elcompanies.com
577/1000Very Poor

The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. is one of the world’s leading manufacturers, marketers, and sellers of quality skin care, makeup, fragrance, and hair care products, and is a steward of outstanding luxury and prestige brands globally. The company’s products are sold in a...

NAICS:32562
NAICS Definition:Toilet Preparation Manufacturing
Employees:52,420
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
3
Known data breaches
4
Attack type number
4

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
FusionPKG

FusionPKG

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
The Estée Lauder Companies Inc.

The Estée Lauder Companies Inc.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Personal Care Product Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for FusionPKG in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Personal Care Product Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. has 191.26% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - FusionPKG (X = Date, Y = Severity)

FusionPKG cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
FusionPKG

FusionPKG

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
The Estée Lauder Companies Inc.

The Estée Lauder Companies Inc.

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
CHE1784787889
🔒 Incident : Breach
THE1783960835
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
BROBECTHEORAABB1773750615

FAQ

Between FusionPKG company and The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between FusionPKG company and The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between FusionPKG company and The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between FusionPKG company and The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between FusionPKG company and The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between FusionPKG company and The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between FusionPKG company and The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between FusionPKG company and The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between FusionPKG company and The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between FusionPKG company and The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between FusionPKG company and The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between FusionPKG and The Estée Lauder Companies Inc., which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between FusionPKG and The Estée Lauder Companies Inc., which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - FusionPKG or The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - FusionPKG or The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. ?
Between FusionPKG and The Estée Lauder Companies Inc., which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between FusionPKG and The Estée Lauder Companies Inc., which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-90461
SUMMARY

OpenStack Ironic through 38.0.0 may send a username and password to an unexpected remote host when Image Service is configured for HTTP(S) Basic Authentication.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-90460
SUMMARY

An issue was discovered in OpenStack Keystone before 29.0.3. Tokens obtained via delegated authentication methods (EC2 credentials, application credentials, OAuth1 access tokens, and trusts) are not blocked from creating, modifying, or deleting credentials via the /v3/credentials API. EC2-derived tokens can additionally read credential blobs, exposing TOTP MFA seeds and other secrets. Also, PATCH /v3/credentials does not validate the requested post-update project_id, allowing any delegated token to move a credential to an unauthorized project. All Keystone deployments using delegated authentication are affected.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-90457
SUMMARY

The administrative password is hashed using a comparatively weak, fast algorithm for the credential store backing one authentication path, and the file containing that hash is written with permissions allowing it to be read by any local user. This is inconsistent with a separate, stronger hashing algorithm used for the same password on another authentication path. A party able to read this file, including a local user or a party with access to a configuration backup, could feasibly recover the underlying password through offline computation, compromising the administrative credential across every path that accepts it.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-90456
SUMMARY

An example environment-configuration file for a bundled inventory-management component ships with a fixed, publicly-known administrative password. A deployment that copies this example file into active configuration without running the setup routine that regenerates credentials will expose that component's administrative interface to anyone aware of the default value.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-90455
SUMMARY

A prior update that raised a bundled HTTP client library to a version remediating known vulnerabilities was later reverted, reintroducing the earlier, vulnerable version into a log-processing component. The only code path in that component using the library issues a request to a single fixed, trusted vendor URL at initialization and does not process attacker-controlled input through the library, limiting practical exploitability of the reintroduced version in this context.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA