Comparison Overview
Fundación Adecco

Fundación Adecco
Calle Príncipe de Vergara, 110, 6ª Planta, Madrid, Madrid, ES, 28001
Last Update: 25/01/2026
Fruto de la Responsabilidad Social Empresarial (RSE) que asume Adecco en España, como líder mundial en la gestión de Recursos Humanos. La Fundación Adecco nace en 1999 con el objetivo de apoyar la inserción en el mercado laboral de aquellas personas que, por sus car...

Randstad
Diemermere 25, Diemen, 1112 TC, NL
Last Update: 01/04/2026
Randstad is the world’s largest talent company and a partner of choice to clients. We are committed to providing equitable opportunities to people from all backgrounds and help them remain relevant in the rapidly changing world of work. We have a deep understanding of t...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Fundación Adecco







Randstad






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Human Resources Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Fundación Adecco in 2026.
Incidents vs Human Resources Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Randstad in 2026.
Incident History - Fundación Adecco (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Fundación Adecco cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Randstad (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Randstad cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Fundación Adecco

Randstad
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.