Comparison Overview
Fundação Telefônica Vivo
Fundação Telefônica Vivo
Avenida Engenheiro Luís Carlos Berrini 1376, São Paulo, 04571-936, BR
Last Update: 09/02/2026
Há 25 anos no Brasil, a Fundação Telefônica Vivo faz parte da esfera social do conceito de ESG da Vivo. Ela atua em prol da educação pública, contribuindo especialmente com o desenvolvimento de competências digitais de educadores e estudantes. Seu foco está em apoiar se...
IEEE
455 Hoes Lane, Piscataway, 08854, US
Last Update: 01/04/2026
IEEE is the world’s largest technical professional organization and is a public charity dedicated to advancing technological innovation and excellence for the benefit of humanity. IEEE and its members inspire a global community through its highly cited publications, con...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
Fundação Telefônica Vivo
IEEE
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Non-profit Organizations Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Fundação Telefônica Vivo in 2026.
Incidents vs Non-profit Organizations Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for IEEE in 2026.
Incident History - Fundação Telefônica Vivo (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Fundação Telefônica Vivo cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - IEEE (X = Date, Y = Severity)
IEEE cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
Fundação Telefônica Vivo
IEEE
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Improper access control in Microsoft Edge for Android allows an unauthorized attacker to bypass a security feature over a network.
A security vulnerability has been detected in NousResearch hermes-agent up to 2026.4.30. Affected is the function GatewayStreamConsumer._filter_and_accumulate of the file gateway/stream_consumer.py of the component Streaming Reasoning Tag Filter. The manipulation leads to improper handling of case sensitivity. The attack may be initiated remotely. The attack's complexity is rated as high. The exploitability is told to be difficult. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. The project decided to not implement a dedicated fix: "[T]he analysis and the fix are both sound. It just lands below the bar for the maintenance cost of a duplicated scrub path."
- https://gist.github.com/YLChen-007/2229e5505bcbb3e15a7ae8fba4c4be37
- https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/
- https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/issues/27288
- https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/28631#issuecomment-4622188016
- https://vuldb.com/cve/CVE-2026-14617
- https://vuldb.com/submit/844654
- https://vuldb.com/vuln/376134
- https://vuldb.com/vuln/376134/cti
Insufficient ui warning of dangerous operations in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network.
Improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('cross-site scripting') in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network.
Relative path traversal in Microsoft Edge for Android allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information locally.