Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Fundação Grupo Boticário de Proteção à NaturezaFundação Grupo Boticário de Proteção à Natureza
VS
Rentokil InitialRentokil Initial
Fundação Grupo Boticário de Proteção à Natureza

Fundação Grupo Boticário de Proteção à Natureza

undefined, undefined, undefined, undefined, BR

Last Update: 25/01/2026

View Profile
751/1000Fair

The Fundação Grupo Boticário (Boticário Group Foundation) is a nonprofit institution whose mission is to promote and take actions to conserve nature. Founded in 1990, the Fundação contributes to the planet’s ecological balance and the maintenance of living conditions fo...

NAICS:541
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:94
Subsidiaries:7
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Rentokil Initial

Rentokil Initial

Compass House, Manor Royal, Crawley, RH10 9PY, GB

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
785/1000Fair

Rentokil Initial plc employs c.68,500 people across 89 countries - offering the experience and expertise of a multi-national organisation, whilst delivering services with the agility and characteristics of a local business. As world leaders in Pest Control and Hygiene...

NAICS:54162
NAICS Definition:Environmental Consulting Services
Employees:12,146
Subsidiaries:27
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Fundação Grupo Boticário de Proteção à Natureza

Fundação Grupo Boticário de Proteção à Natureza

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Rentokil Initial

Rentokil Initial

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Environmental Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fundação Grupo Boticário de Proteção à Natureza in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Environmental Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Rentokil Initial in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Fundação Grupo Boticário de Proteção à Natureza (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fundação Grupo Boticário de Proteção à Natureza cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Rentokil Initial (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Rentokil Initial cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Fundação Grupo Boticário de Proteção à Natureza

Fundação Grupo Boticário de Proteção à Natureza

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Rentokil Initial

Rentokil Initial

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Fundação Grupo Boticário de Proteção à Natureza company and Rentokil Initial company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Fundação Grupo Boticário de Proteção à Natureza company and Rentokil Initial company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Fundação Grupo Boticário de Proteção à Natureza company and Rentokil Initial company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Fundação Grupo Boticário de Proteção à Natureza company and Rentokil Initial company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Fundação Grupo Boticário de Proteção à Natureza company and Rentokil Initial company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Fundação Grupo Boticário de Proteção à Natureza company and Rentokil Initial company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Fundação Grupo Boticário de Proteção à Natureza company and Rentokil Initial company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Fundação Grupo Boticário de Proteção à Natureza company and Rentokil Initial company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Fundação Grupo Boticário de Proteção à Natureza company and Rentokil Initial company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Fundação Grupo Boticário de Proteção à Natureza company and Rentokil Initial company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Fundação Grupo Boticário de Proteção à Natureza company and Rentokil Initial company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Fundação Grupo Boticário de Proteção à Natureza and Rentokil Initial, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Fundação Grupo Boticário de Proteção à Natureza and Rentokil Initial, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Fundação Grupo Boticário de Proteção à Natureza or Rentokil Initial ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Fundação Grupo Boticário de Proteção à Natureza or Rentokil Initial ?
Between Fundação Grupo Boticário de Proteção à Natureza and Rentokil Initial, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Fundação Grupo Boticário de Proteção à Natureza and Rentokil Initial, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-71194
SUMMARY

In OpenStack Designate before 22.0.2, the mDNS handler performs pool-blind lookups when resolving record queries and NOTIFY requests. When two zones with the same name exist across different pools, the lookup fails with a deterministic error, causing the handler to return REFUSED for all DNS queries through that path. The _handle_notify path is exploitable via a single unauthenticated UDP packet. This is independently reachable through the cross-tenant zone overlap described in a different recent CVE, and also affects legitimate same-tenant cross-pool configurations. BIND9 views do not mitigate this issue as mDNS is a shared service upstream of any view configuration.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-12
UPDATED
Date2026-08-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-71193
SUMMARY

In OpenStack Designate before 22.0.1, zone creation checks (_is_subzone, _is_superzone, and the duplicate-zone DB constraint) are scoped to the target pool only. An authenticated user can bypass these checks by scheduling a zone to a different pool via the AttributeFilter scheduler, creating an overlapping zone that conflicts with another tenant's zone. This enables cross-tenant DNS hijack (redirecting traffic to attacker-controlled IPs) and DNS denial of service (NODATA responses). Exploitation requires a multi-pool deployment with AttributeFilter enabled in scheduler_filters, which is a non-default but documented and supported configuration for self-service tiering.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-12
UPDATED
Date2026-08-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.1
CVE-2026-49481
SUMMARY

UpSnap is a wake on lan web app. Versions prior to 5.4.0 have an OS command injection vulnerability in the UpSnap’s device management functionality due to the presence of unsafe shell command template interpolation using the ip and the mac fields. User-controlled values can be inserted into the wake_cmd and shutdown_cmd templates and executed via /bin/sh -c (Linux) or cmd /C (Windows) without sanitization, resulting in an authenticated Remote Code Execution (RCE). A low-privileged user with permission to create or edit devices can execute arbitrary operating system commands on the UpSnap hosted server. Version 5.4.0 patches the issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-12
UPDATED
Date2026-08-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.1
CVE-2026-47718
SUMMARY

FUXA is a web-based Process Visualization (SCADA/HMI/Dashboard) software. When `secureEnabled=true`, FUXA `1.3.0-2773` still allows guest and invalid-token requests to read project, alarms, and scheduler APIs. Version 1.3.1 fixes this issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-12
UPDATED
Date2026-08-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-47717
SUMMARY

FUXA is a web-based Process Visualization (SCADA/HMI/Dashboard) software. In fuxa-server version 1.3.0, the GET /api/project endpoint exposes sensitive project configuration data to guest-context requests even when secureEnabled is enabled. Version 1.3.1 fixes the issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-12
UPDATED
Date2026-08-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9