Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

FUNCTIONAL FABRIC FAIR (powered by PERFORMANCE DAYS)FUNCTIONAL FABRIC FAIR (powered by PERFORMANCE DAYS)
VS
Ananta CompaniesAnanta Companies
FUNCTIONAL FABRIC FAIR (powered by PERFORMANCE DAYS)

FUNCTIONAL FABRIC FAIR (powered by PERFORMANCE DAYS)

655 W. 34th St, New York, 10001, US

Last Update: 03/02/2026

View Profile
756/1000Fair

FUNCTIONAL FABRIC FAIR powered by PERFORMANCE DAYS® events are becoming the most sourcing shows in the US dedicated to the rapidly growing performance fabric industry. The consistent message of sustainability and quality, partnered with our forward-thinking speakers and...

NAICS:N/A
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:91
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Ananta Companies

Ananta Companies

Building-20, Gareeb-e-Nawaz Avenue, Sector-13 Uttara Dhaka, Dhaka 1230, BD

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.ananta.com.bd
762/1000Fair

Ananta is an export oriented Woven- Ready Made Garment (RMG) and Leather finished product company. It is under the membership of the Bangladesh Garment Manufacturers and Exporters Association (BGMEA). The main products are trousers- jeans/spandex/cotton, shirts, unlined...

NAICS:N/A
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:10,001
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
FUNCTIONAL FABRIC FAIR (powered by PERFORMANCE DAYS)

FUNCTIONAL FABRIC FAIR (powered by PERFORMANCE DAYS)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Ananta Companies

Ananta Companies

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Apparel & Fashion Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for FUNCTIONAL FABRIC FAIR (powered by PERFORMANCE DAYS) in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Apparel & Fashion Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ananta Companies in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - FUNCTIONAL FABRIC FAIR (powered by PERFORMANCE DAYS) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

FUNCTIONAL FABRIC FAIR (powered by PERFORMANCE DAYS) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Ananta Companies (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ananta Companies cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
FUNCTIONAL FABRIC FAIR (powered by PERFORMANCE DAYS)

FUNCTIONAL FABRIC FAIR (powered by PERFORMANCE DAYS)

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Ananta Companies

Ananta Companies

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between FUNCTIONAL FABRIC FAIR (powered by PERFORMANCE DAYS) company and Ananta Companies company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between FUNCTIONAL FABRIC FAIR (powered by PERFORMANCE DAYS) company and Ananta Companies company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between FUNCTIONAL FABRIC FAIR (powered by PERFORMANCE DAYS) company and Ananta Companies company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between FUNCTIONAL FABRIC FAIR (powered by PERFORMANCE DAYS) company and Ananta Companies company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between FUNCTIONAL FABRIC FAIR (powered by PERFORMANCE DAYS) company and Ananta Companies company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between FUNCTIONAL FABRIC FAIR (powered by PERFORMANCE DAYS) company and Ananta Companies company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between FUNCTIONAL FABRIC FAIR (powered by PERFORMANCE DAYS) company and Ananta Companies company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between FUNCTIONAL FABRIC FAIR (powered by PERFORMANCE DAYS) company and Ananta Companies company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between FUNCTIONAL FABRIC FAIR (powered by PERFORMANCE DAYS) company and Ananta Companies company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between FUNCTIONAL FABRIC FAIR (powered by PERFORMANCE DAYS) company and Ananta Companies company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between FUNCTIONAL FABRIC FAIR (powered by PERFORMANCE DAYS) company and Ananta Companies company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between FUNCTIONAL FABRIC FAIR (powered by PERFORMANCE DAYS) and Ananta Companies, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between FUNCTIONAL FABRIC FAIR (powered by PERFORMANCE DAYS) and Ananta Companies, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - FUNCTIONAL FABRIC FAIR (powered by PERFORMANCE DAYS) or Ananta Companies ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - FUNCTIONAL FABRIC FAIR (powered by PERFORMANCE DAYS) or Ananta Companies ?
Between FUNCTIONAL FABRIC FAIR (powered by PERFORMANCE DAYS) and Ananta Companies, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between FUNCTIONAL FABRIC FAIR (powered by PERFORMANCE DAYS) and Ananta Companies, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-9044
SUMMARY

An OS command injection vulnerability exists in the VPN module of TP-Link AXE75 V1 routers. This vulnerability allows an adjacent, authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the device by importing a specially crafted VPN client configuration file. The issue arises from improper filtering of special characters.  Successful exploitation of this vulnerability may enable an attacker to gain full control of the affected device, potentially compromising configuration integrity, network security, and service availability.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-31
UPDATED
Date2026-07-31
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:L/SI:L/SA:L/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-54909
SUMMARY

pion/stun is a Go implementation of STUN. Prior to 3.1.3, XORMappedAddress.GetFromAs can panic while parsing a malformed short XOR-MAPPED-ADDRESS attribute in STUN or ICE Binding-response parsing paths, allowing remote denial of service. This issue is fixed in version 3.1.3.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-31
UPDATED
Date2026-07-31
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54785
SUMMARY

gemini-bridge is a lightweight MCP server bridging AI agents to Google's Gemini AI via the official CLI. From 1.0.0 until 1.3.1, consult_gemini_with_files in inline mode read any file path supplied in the files argument without confining it to the working directory, then forwarded the contents to the Gemini CLI. Because the caller also controls query, the file contents are echoed back through the Gemini round-trip (and sent to Google), making this an arbitrary local file read. This issue is fixed in version 1.3.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-31
UPDATED
Date2026-07-31
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.5
CVE-2026-54768
SUMMARY

WPGraphQL provides a GraphQL API for WordPress sites. From 2.0.0 until 2.15.1, the deprecated user field on SendPasswordResetEmailPayload lets an unauthenticated caller distinguish existing author-class accounts through the sendPasswordResetEmail mutation and obtain public profile fields. This issue is fixed in version 2.15.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-31
UPDATED
Date2026-07-31
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-53573
SUMMARY

GeoNetwork is a catalog application to manage spatially referenced resources. From 3.12.0 until 4.2.16 and 4.4.11, unsafe redirect validation in GeonetworkOAuth2LoginAuthenticationFilter and KeycloakAuthenticationProcessingFilter permits an attacker-controlled external redirect after login. This issue is fixed in versions 4.2.16 and 4.4.11.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-31
UPDATED
Date2026-07-31
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 4.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA