Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

FULLBEAUTY BrandsFULLBEAUTY Brands
VS
CoachCoach
FULLBEAUTY Brands

FULLBEAUTY Brands

1 New York Plaza, New York, 10004, US

Last Update: 09/03/2026

View Profile
676/1000Weak

At FULLBEAUTY Brands, we believe that size is just a number and every number counts. We believe in embracing who you are, just the way you are. We believe that women and men of every shape and size deserve the total package: fashion, fit, style and comfort. Proprietary ...

NAICS:448
NAICS Definition:Clothing and Clothing Accessories Stores
Employees:1,859
Subsidiaries:11
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2
Coach

Coach

10 Hudson Yards, New York, NY, US, 10001

Last Update: 29/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.coach.com
793/1000Fair

Coach was founded in 1941 as a family-run workshop. In a Manhattan loft, six artisans handcrafted a collection of leather goods using skills handed down from generation to generation. Discerning consumers soon began to seek out the quality and unique nature of Coach cra...

NAICS:448
NAICS Definition:Clothing and Clothing Accessories Stores
Employees:12,832
Subsidiaries:3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
FULLBEAUTY Brands

FULLBEAUTY Brands

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Coach

Coach

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Apparel and Fashion Industry Avg (This Year)

FULLBEAUTY Brands has 66.67% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Retail Apparel and Fashion Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Coach in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - FULLBEAUTY Brands (X = Date, Y = Severity)

FULLBEAUTY Brands cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Coach (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Coach cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
FULLBEAUTY Brands

FULLBEAUTY Brands

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
FULCUUELOFUL1769214430
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
FULFOU1769468199
Coach

Coach

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between FULLBEAUTY Brands company and Coach company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between FULLBEAUTY Brands company and Coach company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between FULLBEAUTY Brands company and Coach company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between FULLBEAUTY Brands company and Coach company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between FULLBEAUTY Brands company and Coach company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between FULLBEAUTY Brands company and Coach company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between FULLBEAUTY Brands company and Coach company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between FULLBEAUTY Brands company and Coach company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between FULLBEAUTY Brands company and Coach company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between FULLBEAUTY Brands company and Coach company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between FULLBEAUTY Brands company and Coach company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between FULLBEAUTY Brands and Coach, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between FULLBEAUTY Brands and Coach, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - FULLBEAUTY Brands or Coach ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - FULLBEAUTY Brands or Coach ?
Between FULLBEAUTY Brands and Coach, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between FULLBEAUTY Brands and Coach, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-57980
SUMMARY

Authentication bypass using an alternate path or channel in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform tampering over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-56741
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not apply an upper bound to terminal dimensions received via the Telnet NAWS option, and TelnetIO.handleNAWS() in TelnetIO.java:856-879 reads client-supplied width and height as 16-bit unsigned integers and passes values such as 65535x65535 to setTerminalGeometry(), allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to repeatedly alternate values and trigger continuous expensive rendering work that causes CPU exhaustion and denial of service. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56740
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not limit the number of environment variables a client may inject via the Telnet NEW-ENVIRON option, and TelnetIO.readNEVariables() in TelnetIO.java:1127-1180 stores each variable pair in a HashMap held by ConnectionData, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to flood unique variable pairs before the terminating IAC SE byte and exhaust JVM heap memory with an OutOfMemoryError. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56171
SUMMARY

Exposure of private personal information to an unauthorized actor in Windows RDP allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-54335
SUMMARY

Feathersjs is a framework for creating web APIs and real-time applications with TypeScript or JavaScript. In 5.0.44 and earlier, the _.merge(target, source) utility exported by @feathersjs/commons recursively merges source into target by iterating Object.keys(source). When source was produced by JSON.parse and contains a __proto__, constructor, or prototype key, that key is returned as an own-enumerable property; the recursive merge then resolves target['__proto__'] to Object.prototype and writes attacker-supplied properties onto it, polluting the prototype for all plain objects in the process for the lifetime of the Node process. This issue is fixed in version 5.0.45.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2