Comparison Overview
Fujitsu ServiceNow
Fujitsu ServiceNow
N/A
Last Update: 30/04/2026
Fujitsu has the experience to put the strategic potential of ServiceNow to work, and the knowledge to make the complex simple. We help you connect processes and data across the enterprise so you can create great experiences for your employees and customers. With our ...
AeC
Rua Espírito Santo, 871 - Bairro Centro, Belo Horizonte, 30160-031, BR
Last Update: 08/09/2026
A AeC é apontada consistentemente como a líder brasileira na entrega de soluções de experiência do cliente e gestão de processos terceirizados. Servindo as principais marcas do mercado nacional, conquistou nos três últimos anos a posição de Empresa do Ano de BPO pela ...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
Fujitsu ServiceNow
AeC
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Fujitsu ServiceNow in 2026.
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for AeC in 2026.
Incident History - Fujitsu ServiceNow (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Fujitsu ServiceNow cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - AeC (X = Date, Y = Severity)
AeC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
Fujitsu ServiceNow
AeC
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.
IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.
IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.