Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Fujitsu Network CommunicationsFujitsu Network Communications
VS
TIMTIM
Fujitsu Network Communications

Fujitsu Network Communications

2801 Telecom Parkway, Richardson, Texas, 75082, US

Last Update: 16/03/2026

View Profile

Fujitsu Network Communications, Inc., is a leading provider of digital transformation solutions for network operators, service providers, and content providers worldwide. We combine best-in-class hardware, software, and services with multivendor expertise to enable cost...

NAICS:517
NAICS Definition:Telecommunications
Employees:1,585
Subsidiaries:15
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
TIM

TIM

Via Gaetano Negri, 1, Milano, 20123, IT

Last Update: 30/03/2026

View Profile
783/1000Fair

We are driving the digital transition of Italy and Brazil with innovative technologies and services because we want to contribute to accelerating the sustainable growth of the economy and society by bringing value and prosperity to people, companies and institutions. W...

NAICS:517
NAICS Definition:Telecommunications
Employees:22,280
Subsidiaries:6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Fujitsu Network Communications

Fujitsu Network Communications

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
TIM

TIM

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fujitsu Network Communications in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for TIM in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Fujitsu Network Communications (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fujitsu Network Communications cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - TIM (X = Date, Y = Severity)

TIM cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Fujitsu Network Communications

Fujitsu Network Communications

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
TIM

TIM

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Fujitsu Network Communications company and TIM company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Fujitsu Network Communications company and TIM company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Fujitsu Network Communications company and TIM company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Fujitsu Network Communications company and TIM company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Fujitsu Network Communications company and TIM company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Fujitsu Network Communications company and TIM company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Fujitsu Network Communications company and TIM company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Fujitsu Network Communications company and TIM company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Fujitsu Network Communications company and TIM company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Fujitsu Network Communications company and TIM company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Fujitsu Network Communications company and TIM company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Fujitsu Network Communications and TIM, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Fujitsu Network Communications and TIM, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Fujitsu Network Communications or TIM ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Fujitsu Network Communications or TIM ?
Between Fujitsu Network Communications and TIM, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Fujitsu Network Communications and TIM, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67866
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Systerel S2OPC 1.7.3 allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via the LockedStaMac_ProcessMsg_DeleteMonitoredItemsResponse and SOPC_StaMac_NewDeleteMonitoredItems in the client wrapper DeleteMonitoredItems path

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-67863
SUMMARY

In open62541 1.5.5, a server-side use-after-free exists in the local MonitoredItem callback path. The issue occurs when UA_Subscription_localPublish continues to use the current UA_Notification after a callback invokes UA_Server_deleteMonitoredItem for the current local MonitoredItem. This allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-19026
SUMMARY

H5Z__filter_nbit in H5Znbit.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 dereferences cd_values[0] through cd_values[4] without validating that cd_values is non-NULL or that cd_nelmts is at least 5, the fixed size of the filter's header. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service via a crafted HDF5 file that stores the N-Bit filter pipeline message with zero client-data values, opened and read via H5Dread, e.g. by the h5ls or h5repack tools.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-19025
SUMMARY

H5O__layout_decode in H5Olayout.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 does not validate that a chunked dataset's stored chunk-layout dimensionality matches its dataspace rank when an existing dataset is opened, whereas this check is performed only at dataset-creation time. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service (divide-by-zero and application crash in H5S__hyper_iter_get_seq_list in src/H5Shyper.c) via a crafted HDF5 file with mismatched chunk/dataspace ranks that is opened and read via H5Dopen2 and H5Dread, e.g. by the h5repack tool.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA