Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Fujitsu LatinX Link (LXL)Fujitsu LatinX Link (LXL)
VS
General Dynamics Information TechnologyGeneral Dynamics Information Technology
Fujitsu LatinX Link (LXL)

Fujitsu LatinX Link (LXL)

Richardson, 75082, US

Last Update: 17/01/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.fujitsu.com/us/
751/1000Fair

LatinX Link at Fujitsu empowers Hispanic members, stimulates Hispanic diversity, and promotes Hispanic cultural awareness.

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:15
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
General Dynamics Information Technology

General Dynamics Information Technology

Falls Church, Virginia, US, 22042

Last Update: 13/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.gdit.com
786/1000Fair

GDIT is a global technology and professional services company that delivers solutions, technology and mission services to every major agency across the U.S. government, defense and intelligence community. Our 30,000 experts extract the power of technology to create imm...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:26,279
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Fujitsu LatinX Link (LXL)

Fujitsu LatinX Link (LXL)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
General Dynamics Information Technology

General Dynamics Information Technology

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fujitsu LatinX Link (LXL) in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for General Dynamics Information Technology in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Fujitsu LatinX Link (LXL) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fujitsu LatinX Link (LXL) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - General Dynamics Information Technology (X = Date, Y = Severity)

General Dynamics Information Technology cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Fujitsu LatinX Link (LXL)

Fujitsu LatinX Link (LXL)

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
General Dynamics Information Technology

General Dynamics Information Technology

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
GDI1765641604

FAQ

Between Fujitsu LatinX Link (LXL) company and General Dynamics Information Technology company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Fujitsu LatinX Link (LXL) company and General Dynamics Information Technology company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Fujitsu LatinX Link (LXL) company and General Dynamics Information Technology company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Fujitsu LatinX Link (LXL) company and General Dynamics Information Technology company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Fujitsu LatinX Link (LXL) company and General Dynamics Information Technology company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Fujitsu LatinX Link (LXL) company and General Dynamics Information Technology company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Fujitsu LatinX Link (LXL) company and General Dynamics Information Technology company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Fujitsu LatinX Link (LXL) company and General Dynamics Information Technology company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Fujitsu LatinX Link (LXL) company and General Dynamics Information Technology company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Fujitsu LatinX Link (LXL) company and General Dynamics Information Technology company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Fujitsu LatinX Link (LXL) company and General Dynamics Information Technology company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Fujitsu LatinX Link (LXL) and General Dynamics Information Technology, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Fujitsu LatinX Link (LXL) and General Dynamics Information Technology, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Fujitsu LatinX Link (LXL) or General Dynamics Information Technology ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Fujitsu LatinX Link (LXL) or General Dynamics Information Technology ?
Between Fujitsu LatinX Link (LXL) and General Dynamics Information Technology, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Fujitsu LatinX Link (LXL) and General Dynamics Information Technology, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-103591
SUMMARY

DeepWiki-Open through commit d92819a contains an unauthenticated arbitrary file read vulnerability in the GET /codemap/file endpoint via the repo_url parameter. Attackers can supply a non-URL repo_url value to bypass path containment checks and read any file accessible to the API process by specifying absolute file paths.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-30
UPDATED
Date2026-09-30
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-103590
SUMMARY

QloApps through 1.7.0 contains a reflected cross-site scripting vulnerability in the back-office room type editor's length of stay fields. Attackers can induce authenticated administrators to submit crafted POST requests with malicious payloads in restriction_min_los and restriction_max_los parameters, executing arbitrary JavaScript in the victim's administrative session.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-30
UPDATED
Date2026-09-30
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
2.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3
CVE-2026-103589
SUMMARY

QloApps through 1.7.0 contains a reflected cross-site scripting vulnerability in the back-office room type editor that fails to escape room_num, floor, and comment field values in input attributes. Attackers can induce authenticated back-office users to submit crafted POST requests with malicious payloads to execute arbitrary JavaScript in the victim's administrative session.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-30
UPDATED
Date2026-09-30
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
2.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3
CVE-2026-103588
SUMMARY

QloApps through 1.7.0 contains a reflected cross-site scripting vulnerability in the exceptions field of the back-office Transplant a module form. Attackers can craft a malicious link containing JavaScript payload in the exceptions parameter that executes in an authenticated administrator's session when the victim follows the link.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-30
UPDATED
Date2026-09-30
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
2.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3
CVE-2026-103587
SUMMARY

QloApps through 1.7.0 contains a reflected cross-site scripting vulnerability in the back-office Hotel Reservation System Book Now search, where date_to and id_room_type parameters are copied into template variables without validation. Attackers can craft a malicious link containing JavaScript payload in these parameters that executes in an authenticated administrator's session when the victim follows the link.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-30
UPDATED
Date2026-09-30
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
2.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3