Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

FUJIFILM CorporationFUJIFILM Corporation
VS
SasolSasol
FUJIFILM Corporation

FUJIFILM Corporation

7-3, Akasaka 9-chome, None, Minato-ku, Tokyo, JP, 107-0052

Last Update: 24/03/2026

View Profile
726/1000Moderate

At Fujifilm we create innovative products and deliver effective solutions in a wide variety of fields to serve society, contribute to the quality of life, and enhance environmental sustainability. Beginning in 1934 as Japan's pioneering photographic film maker, Fujifil...

NAICS:325
NAICS Definition:Chemical Manufacturing
Employees:3,287
Subsidiaries:27
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Sasol

Sasol

50 Katherine Street, Sandton, 2191, ZA

Last Update: 14/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.sasol.com
780/1000Fair

Sasol is a global chemicals and energy company. We harness our knowledge and expertise to integrate sophisticated technologies and processes into world-scale operating facilities. We safely and sustainably source, produce and market a range of high-quality products in...

NAICS:325
NAICS Definition:Chemical Manufacturing
Employees:18,019
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
FUJIFILM Corporation

FUJIFILM Corporation

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Sasol

Sasol

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Chemical Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for FUJIFILM Corporation in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Chemical Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sasol in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - FUJIFILM Corporation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

FUJIFILM Corporation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Sasol (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sasol cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
FUJIFILM Corporation

FUJIFILM Corporation

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
FUJ203810322
Sasol

Sasol

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between FUJIFILM Corporation company and Sasol company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between FUJIFILM Corporation company and Sasol company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between FUJIFILM Corporation company and Sasol company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between FUJIFILM Corporation company and Sasol company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between FUJIFILM Corporation company and Sasol company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between FUJIFILM Corporation company and Sasol company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between FUJIFILM Corporation company and Sasol company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between FUJIFILM Corporation company and Sasol company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between FUJIFILM Corporation company and Sasol company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between FUJIFILM Corporation company and Sasol company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between FUJIFILM Corporation company and Sasol company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between FUJIFILM Corporation and Sasol, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between FUJIFILM Corporation and Sasol, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - FUJIFILM Corporation or Sasol ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - FUJIFILM Corporation or Sasol ?
Between FUJIFILM Corporation and Sasol, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between FUJIFILM Corporation and Sasol, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-113705
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was determined in a2aproject a2a-rs up to 0.4.3. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file a2a-server/src/error.rs. Executing a manipulation can lead to information exposure through error message. The attack can be executed remotely. This patch is called 713b943af94ab2d521d483b841618b97a2e78a4d. A patch should be applied to remediate this issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-20
UPDATED
Date2026-10-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 5.0
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-9825
SUMMARY

IBM Cyber Fraud 1.0.0 through 1.0.2 has a missing secure attribute allowing sensitive cookies to be transmitted over unencrypted connections, potentially enabling an attacker to intercept session data through network-based attacks.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-20
UPDATED
Date2026-10-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-94402
SUMMARY

IBM Carbon Charts 0.4.0 through 1.27.19 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. The MeterChart component's Title.truncateTitle() function re-inserts a substring of user-supplied label text into the DOM via an unsanitized innerHTML write when the title exceeds the available container width. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary JavaScript in the victim's browser session.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-20
UPDATED
Date2026-10-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-93888
SUMMARY

IBM Sterling Connect Direct for Unix 6.4.0.0 through 6.4.0.6 and 6.3.0.0 through 6.3.0.7 apnotify utility is vulnerable to a code injection due to insufficient validation of user input.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-20
UPDATED
Date2026-10-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-93744
SUMMARY

IBM i 7.3, 7.4, 7.5, and 7.6 could allow an unathenticated remote attacker to bypass security restrictions due to improper access control. By sending a specially crafted HTTP request to any URL within the Navigator application prior to authentication, a bad actor could exploit this vulnerability to alter server-side session security state.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-20
UPDATED
Date2026-10-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9