Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Fujifilm Recording Media APACFujifilm Recording Media APAC
VS
NVIDIANVIDIA
Fujifilm Recording Media APAC

Fujifilm Recording Media APAC

10 New Industrial Road Fujifilm Building , Singapore, 536201, SG

Last Update: 09/03/2026

View Profile

Fujifilm sets the benchmarks for computer data storage, professional video production and TV broadcasting. Whether recording dramatic footage or safeguarding corporate data, our products assure reliability backed by continuous innovation.

NAICS:3341
NAICS Definition:Computer and Peripheral Equipment Manufacturing
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:9
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
NVIDIA

NVIDIA

2701 San Tomas Expressway, Santa Clara, 95050, US

Last Update: 12/10/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.nvidia.com
787/1000Fair

Since its founding in 1993, NVIDIA (NASDAQ: NVDA) has been a pioneer in accelerated computing. The company’s invention of the GPU in 1999 sparked the growth of the PC gaming market, redefined computer graphics, ignited the era of modern AI and is fueling the creation of...

NAICS:3341
NAICS Definition:Computer and Peripheral Equipment Manufacturing
Employees:50,410
Subsidiaries:19
12-month incidents
15
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
4

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Fujifilm Recording Media APAC

Fujifilm Recording Media APAC

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
NVIDIA

NVIDIA

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computer Hardware Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fujifilm Recording Media APAC in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Computer Hardware Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

NVIDIA has 1370.59% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Fujifilm Recording Media APAC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fujifilm Recording Media APAC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - NVIDIA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

NVIDIA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Fujifilm Recording Media APAC

Fujifilm Recording Media APAC

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
NVIDIA

NVIDIA

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
GITGOLNVI1791815573
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
NVIAMD1789014785
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
LAMNVINOR1791491254

FAQ

Between Fujifilm Recording Media APAC company and NVIDIA company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Fujifilm Recording Media APAC company and NVIDIA company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Fujifilm Recording Media APAC company and NVIDIA company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Fujifilm Recording Media APAC company and NVIDIA company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Fujifilm Recording Media APAC company and NVIDIA company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Fujifilm Recording Media APAC company and NVIDIA company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Fujifilm Recording Media APAC company and NVIDIA company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Fujifilm Recording Media APAC company and NVIDIA company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Fujifilm Recording Media APAC company and NVIDIA company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Fujifilm Recording Media APAC company and NVIDIA company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Fujifilm Recording Media APAC company and NVIDIA company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Fujifilm Recording Media APAC and NVIDIA, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Fujifilm Recording Media APAC and NVIDIA, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Fujifilm Recording Media APAC or NVIDIA ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Fujifilm Recording Media APAC or NVIDIA ?
Between Fujifilm Recording Media APAC and NVIDIA, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Fujifilm Recording Media APAC and NVIDIA, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-93892
SUMMARY

IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-93891
SUMMARY

IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3
CVE-2026-92832
SUMMARY

IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.5
CVE-2026-85457
SUMMARY

IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-84418
SUMMARY

IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2