Comparison Overview
FUJIFILM Philippines Medical Systems

FUJIFILM Philippines Medical Systems
N/A
Last Update: 22/04/2026
FUJIFILM Philippines Inc. is a trusted leader in innovative imaging and healthcare solutions, offering advanced systems, services, and AI-powered technologies that support medical professionals across various fields—including Healthcare IT, MRI/CT, X-ray, endoscopy, ult...

UMC Utrecht
Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht, 3508GA, NL
Last Update: 30/03/2026
The University Medical Center Utrecht is one of the largest academic healthcare institutions in the Netherlands. We provide the best healthcare for today’s patients, and we also work towards a healthy society in the future. Our organization has three core tasks: care, r...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

FUJIFILM Philippines Medical Systems







UMC Utrecht






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for FUJIFILM Philippines Medical Systems in 2026.
Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for UMC Utrecht in 2026.
Incident History - FUJIFILM Philippines Medical Systems (X = Date, Y = Severity)
FUJIFILM Philippines Medical Systems cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - UMC Utrecht (X = Date, Y = Severity)
UMC Utrecht cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

FUJIFILM Philippines Medical Systems

UMC Utrecht
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.