Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

FUJIFILM Cellular Dynamics, IncFUJIFILM Cellular Dynamics, Inc
VS
Syneos HealthSyneos Health
FUJIFILM Cellular Dynamics, Inc

FUJIFILM Cellular Dynamics, Inc

525 Science Drive, Madison, WI, US, 53711

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.fujifilmcdi.com
752/1000Fair

Fujifilm Cellular Dynamics, Inc. develops and manufactures biologically relevant human cells derived from induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells. Our iCell® and donor-specific MyCell® Products are highly pure, highly reproducible, and available in industrial quantity to e...

NAICS:541714
NAICS Definition:Research and Development in Biotechnology (except Nanobiotechnology)
Employees:194
Subsidiaries:25
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Syneos Health

Syneos Health

1030 Sync Street, Morrisville, 27560, US

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.syneoshealth.com
794/1000Fair

Syneos Health® is a leading fully integrated biopharmaceutical solutions organization built to accelerate customer success. We translate unique clinical, medical affairs and commercial insights into outcomes to address modern market realities. We bring together a ta...

NAICS:541714
NAICS Definition:Research and Development in Biotechnology (except Nanobiotechnology)
Employees:23,166
Subsidiaries:17
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
FUJIFILM Cellular Dynamics, Inc

FUJIFILM Cellular Dynamics, Inc

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Syneos Health

Syneos Health

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Biotechnology Research Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for FUJIFILM Cellular Dynamics, Inc in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Biotechnology Research Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Syneos Health in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - FUJIFILM Cellular Dynamics, Inc (X = Date, Y = Severity)

FUJIFILM Cellular Dynamics, Inc cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Syneos Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Syneos Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
FUJIFILM Cellular Dynamics, Inc

FUJIFILM Cellular Dynamics, Inc

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Syneos Health

Syneos Health

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between FUJIFILM Cellular Dynamics, Inc company and Syneos Health company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between FUJIFILM Cellular Dynamics, Inc company and Syneos Health company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between FUJIFILM Cellular Dynamics, Inc company and Syneos Health company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between FUJIFILM Cellular Dynamics, Inc company and Syneos Health company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between FUJIFILM Cellular Dynamics, Inc company and Syneos Health company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between FUJIFILM Cellular Dynamics, Inc company and Syneos Health company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between FUJIFILM Cellular Dynamics, Inc company and Syneos Health company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between FUJIFILM Cellular Dynamics, Inc company and Syneos Health company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between FUJIFILM Cellular Dynamics, Inc company and Syneos Health company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between FUJIFILM Cellular Dynamics, Inc company and Syneos Health company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between FUJIFILM Cellular Dynamics, Inc company and Syneos Health company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between FUJIFILM Cellular Dynamics, Inc and Syneos Health, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between FUJIFILM Cellular Dynamics, Inc and Syneos Health, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - FUJIFILM Cellular Dynamics, Inc or Syneos Health ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - FUJIFILM Cellular Dynamics, Inc or Syneos Health ?
Between FUJIFILM Cellular Dynamics, Inc and Syneos Health, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between FUJIFILM Cellular Dynamics, Inc and Syneos Health, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2