Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

FUGAFUGA
VS
Yamaha CorporationYamaha Corporation
FUGA

FUGA

Prinsengracht 583 - IV, Amsterdam, Noord Holland, 1016 HT, NL

Last Update: 01/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.fuga.com
761/1000Fair

The world’s leading B2B distributor. Forward-thinking music distribution and marketing services. Industry-leading technology. A Downtown Company.

NAICS:71113
NAICS Definition:Musical Groups and Artists
Employees:272
Subsidiaries:9
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Yamaha Corporation

Yamaha Corporation

10-1 Nakazawacho, Naka Ward, , Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, JP, 430-0904

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.yamaha.com/
786/1000Fair

Our history began in 1887 when Yamaha founder Torakusu Yamaha completed a repair job on a reed organ at a Japanese primary school. Perhaps no one thought at the time that this event would mark the beginning of 130-plus year history during which Yamaha would become a wor...

NAICS:71113
NAICS Definition:Musical Groups and Artists
Employees:12,590
Subsidiaries:6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
FUGA

FUGA

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Yamaha Corporation

Yamaha Corporation

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Musicians Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for FUGA in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Musicians Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Yamaha Corporation in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - FUGA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

FUGA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Yamaha Corporation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Yamaha Corporation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
FUGA

FUGA

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Yamaha Corporation

Yamaha Corporation

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between FUGA company and Yamaha Corporation company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between FUGA company and Yamaha Corporation company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between FUGA company and Yamaha Corporation company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between FUGA company and Yamaha Corporation company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between FUGA company and Yamaha Corporation company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between FUGA company and Yamaha Corporation company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between FUGA company and Yamaha Corporation company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between FUGA company and Yamaha Corporation company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between FUGA company and Yamaha Corporation company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between FUGA company and Yamaha Corporation company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between FUGA company and Yamaha Corporation company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between FUGA and Yamaha Corporation, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between FUGA and Yamaha Corporation, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - FUGA or Yamaha Corporation ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - FUGA or Yamaha Corporation ?
Between FUGA and Yamaha Corporation, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between FUGA and Yamaha Corporation, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2